BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10420776)

  • 1. Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues.
    Ophir J; Alam SK; Garra B; Kallel F; Konofagou E; Krouskop T; Varghese T
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1999; 213(3):203-33. PubMed ID: 10420776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new elastographic method for estimation and imaging of lateral displacements, lateral strains, corrected axial strains and Poisson's ratios in tissues.
    Konofagou E; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1998 Oct; 24(8):1183-99. PubMed ID: 9833588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of strain-based and model-based modulus elastography.
    Doyley MM; Srinivasan S; Pendergrass SA; Wu Z; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 31(6):787-802. PubMed ID: 15936495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The feasibility of estimating and imaging the mechanical behavior of poroelastic materials using axial strain elastography.
    Righetti R; Righetti M; Ophir J; Krouskop TA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3241-59. PubMed ID: 17505100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing image quality in effective Poisson's ratio elastography and poroelastography: I.
    Righetti R; Srinivasan S; Kumar AT; Ophir J; Krouskop TA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1303-20. PubMed ID: 17301456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A quantitative comparison of modulus images obtained using nanoindentation with strain elastograms.
    Srinivasan S; Krouskop T; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 30(7):899-918. PubMed ID: 15313323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Theoretical bounds on the estimation of transverse displacement, transverse strain and Poisson's ratio in elastography.
    Konofagou EE; Varghese T; Ophir J
    Ultrason Imaging; 2000 Jul; 22(3):153-77. PubMed ID: 11297149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elastographic imaging of low-contrast elastic modulus distributions in tissue.
    Kallel F; Ophir J; Magee K; Krouskop T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1998 Mar; 24(3):409-25. PubMed ID: 9587996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing image quality in effective Poisson's ratio elastography and poroelastography: II.
    Righetti R; Ophir J; Kumar AT; Krouskop TA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1321-33. PubMed ID: 17301457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fundamental mechanical limitations on the visualization of elasticity contrast in elastography.
    Ponnekanti H; Ophir J; Huang Y; Céspedes I
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 7571146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial angular compounding for elastography without the incompressibility assumption.
    Rao M; Varghese T
    Ultrason Imaging; 2005 Oct; 27(4):256-70. PubMed ID: 16761786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of Poisson's ratio on elastographic direct and inverse problems.
    Fehrenbach J
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):707-16. PubMed ID: 17228115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise analysis and improvement of displacement vector estimation from angular displacements.
    Chen H; Varghese T
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2007-17. PubMed ID: 18561677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct and gradient-based average strain estimation by using weighted nearest neighbor cross-correlation peaks.
    Hussain MA; Abu Anas EM; Alam SK; Lee SY; Hasan MK
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Aug; 59(8):1713-28. PubMed ID: 22899118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonic strain imaging and reconstructive elastography for biological tissue.
    Khaled W; Reichling S; Bruhns OT; Ermert H
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e199-202. PubMed ID: 16857230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analytic modeling of breast elastography.
    Liu HT; Sun LZ; Wang G; Vannier MW
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2340-9. PubMed ID: 14528956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel breast software phantom for biomechanical modeling of elastography.
    Bhatti SN; Sridhar-Keralapura M
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1748-68. PubMed ID: 22482599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing elastographic strain images with modulus images obtained using nanoindentation: preliminary results using phantoms and tissue samples.
    Srinivasan S; Krouskop T; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 30(3):329-43. PubMed ID: 15063515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise reduction for ultrasonic elastography using transmit-side frequency compounding: a preliminary study.
    Cui S; Liu DC
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Mar; 58(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 21429843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A least-squares strain estimator for elastography.
    Kallel F; Ophir J
    Ultrason Imaging; 1997 Jul; 19(3):195-208. PubMed ID: 9447668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.