320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10420776)
41. Characterization of biomechanical properties of agar based tissue mimicking phantoms for ultrasound stiffness imaging techniques.
Manickam K; Machireddy RR; Seshadri S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():132-43. PubMed ID: 24769915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Tradeoffs in elastographic imaging.
Varghese T; Ophir J; Konofagou E; Kallel F; Righetti R
Ultrason Imaging; 2001 Oct; 23(4):216-48. PubMed ID: 12051276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A New Method for Estimating the Effective Poisson's Ratio in Ultrasound Poroelastography.
Islam MT; Chaudhry A; Tang S; Tasciotti E; Righetti R
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 May; 37(5):1178-1191. PubMed ID: 29727281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio and their trade-offs with resolution in axial-shear strain elastography.
Thitaikumar A; Krouskop TA; Ophir J
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 17183125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Nonlinear elasticity imaging: theory and phantom study.
Erkamp RQ; Emelianov SY; Skovoroda AR; O'Donnell M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 May; 51(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 15217231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Noise performance and signal-to-noise ratio of shear strain elastograms.
Kumar AT; Ophir J; Krouskop TA
Ultrason Imaging; 2005 Jul; 27(3):145-65. PubMed ID: 16550705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Finite element modeling and intravascular ultrasound elastography of vulnerable plaques: parameter variation.
Baldewsing RA; de Korte CL; Schaar JA; Mastik F; van der Steen AF
Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):723-9. PubMed ID: 15047374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Theoretical derivation of SNR, CNR and spatial resolution for a local adaptive strain estimator for elastography.
Srinivasan S; Ophir J; Alam SK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1185-97. PubMed ID: 15550322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression.
Krouskop TA; Wheeler TM; Kallel F; Garra BS; Hall T
Ultrason Imaging; 1998 Oct; 20(4):260-74. PubMed ID: 10197347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. 3D prostate elastography: algorithm, simulations and experiments.
Patil AV; Garson CD; Hossack JA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(12):3643-63. PubMed ID: 17664564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Ultrasound elastography of the prostate. A new technique for tumor detection].
Lorenz A; Ermert H; Sommerfeld HJ; Garcia-Schürmann M; Senge T; Philippou S
Ultraschall Med; 2000 Feb; 21(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 10746278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A method for experimental characterization of the noise performance of elastographic systems.
Varghese T; Ophir J
Ultrason Imaging; 1999 Jan; 21(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 10230007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. An experimental characterization of elastographic spatial resolution: analysis of the trade-offs between spatial resolution and contrast-to-noise ratio.
Srinivasan S; Righetti R; Ophir J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 30(10):1269-80. PubMed ID: 15582226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Ex vivo and in vivo assessment of the non-linearity of elasticity properties of breast tissues for quantitative strain elastography.
Umemoto T; Ueno E; Matsumura T; Yamakawa M; Bando H; Mitake T; Shiina T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1755-68. PubMed ID: 24802305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Reduction of stress nonuniformities by apodization of compressor displacement in elastography.
Konofagou E; Dutta P; Ophir J; Céspedes I
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1996; 22(9):1229-36. PubMed ID: 9123647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Towards clinical prostate ultrasound elastography using full inversion approach.
Mousavi SR; Sadeghi-Naini A; Czarnota GJ; Samani A
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):033501. PubMed ID: 24593743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Lateral resolution in elastography.
Righetti R; Srinivasan S; Ophir J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 May; 29(5):695-704. PubMed ID: 12754069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Advances in finite element simulations of elastosonography for breast lesion detection.
Celi S; Di Puccio F; Forte P
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Aug; 133(8):081006. PubMed ID: 21950899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Elastographic image quality vs. tissue motion in vivo.
Chandrasekhar R; Ophir J; Krouskop T; Ophir K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 32(6):847-55. PubMed ID: 16785007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Elastographic imaging.
Ophir J; Garra B; Kallel F; Konofagou E; Krouskop T; Righetti R; Varghese T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 May; 26 Suppl 1():S23-9. PubMed ID: 10794867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
