132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10421542)
1. Comparison of AJCC 1988 and 1997 classifications for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. American Joint Committee on Cancer.
Ozyar E; Yildiz F; Akyol FH; Atahan IL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(5):1079-87. PubMed ID: 10421542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrospective comparison of the AJCC 5th edition classification for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with the AJCC 4th edition: an experience in Taiwan.
Chien CR; Chen SW; Hsieh CY; Liang JA; Yang SN; Huang CY; Lin FJ
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2001 Aug; 31(8):363-9. PubMed ID: 11574628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-metastatic stage IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: analysis of the pattern of relapse and survival.
Ozyar E; Gurkaynak M; Yildiz F; Atahan IL
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Jul; 72(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 15236877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The predictive value of the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer stage classification in determining failure patterns in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Chua DT; Sham JS; Wei WI; Ho WK; Au GK
Cancer; 2001 Dec; 92(11):2845-55. PubMed ID: 11753958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison between the Chinese 2008 and the 7th edition AJCC staging systems for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Pan J; Xu Y; Qiu S; Zong J; Guo Q; Zhang Y; Lin S; Lu JJ
Am J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 38(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 23608833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma: a comparison of the 1997 and 1977 American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems.
Le QT; Fu KK; Kaplan M; Terris DJ; Fee WE; Goffinet DR
Cancer; 1999 Nov; 86(9):1700-11. PubMed ID: 10547542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of Ho's, International Union Against Cancer, and American Joint Committee stage classifications for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Teo PM; Leung SF; Yu P; Tsao SY; Foo W; Shiu W
Cancer; 1991 Jan; 67(2):434-9. PubMed ID: 1985736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the 1997 AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma prognostically useful for Chinese patient populations?
Ma J; Mai HQ; Hong MH; Cui NJ; Lu TX; Lu LX; Mo HY; Min HQ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1181-9. PubMed ID: 11483327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Another way to estimate outcome of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma--is concurrent chemoradiotherapy adequate?
Lin JC; Liang WM; Jan JS; Jiang RS; Lin AC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Sep; 60(1):156-64. PubMed ID: 15337551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment results of 59 young patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Selek U; Ozyar E; Ozyigit G; Varan A; Buyukpamukcu M; Atahan IL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Feb; 69(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 15656953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the seventh and eighth editions of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: analysis of 1317 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy at two centers.
Yang XL; Wang Y; Liang SB; He SS; Chen DM; Chen HY; Lu LX; Chen Y
BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):606. PubMed ID: 29843648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on intensity-modulated radiation therapy: results of a prospective multicentric clinical study.
Kang M; Long J; Li G; Yan H; Feng G; Liu M; Zhu J; Wang R
Oncotarget; 2016 Mar; 7(12):15252-61. PubMed ID: 26918446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic value of masticatory muscle involvement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Kang M; Zhou P; Liao X; Xu M; Wang R
Oral Oncol; 2017 Dec; 75():100-105. PubMed ID: 29224805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Correlation between quantitative parameters and clinical stage.
Xu XQ; Ma G; Wang YJ; Hu H; Su GY; Shi HB; Wu FY
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(29):47230-47238. PubMed ID: 28525383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Validation of the 7th edition AJCC staging system.
Zong J; Lin S; Lin J; Tang L; Chen B; Zhang M; Zhang Y; Xu L; Chen Y; Xiao Y; Fang Y; Pan J
Oral Oncol; 2015 Mar; 51(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 25467207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation and suggestion of eighth T classifications of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a retrospective analysis.
Li Y; Ou X; Hu C
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2018 Oct; 48(10):927-933. PubMed ID: 30113640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (AJCC TNM) staging in patients with stage II and stage III colorectal carcinoma: analysis of 2511 cases from a medical centre in Korea.
Kim KH; Yang SS; Yoon YS; Lim SB; Yu CS; Kim JC
Colorectal Dis; 2011 Aug; 13(8):e220-6. PubMed ID: 21689314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with retropharyngeal lymph node metastases: a minimum axial diameter of 6 mm is a more accurate prognostic predictor than 5 mm.
Li YZ; Xie CM; Wu YP; Cui CY; Huang ZL; Lu CY; Wu PH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 25539232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment outcome for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in University Malaya Medical Centre from 2004-2008.
Chee Ee Phua V; Loo WH; Yusof MM; Wan Ishak WZ; Tho LM; Ung NM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(8):4567-70. PubMed ID: 24083703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recommendations for Updating T and N Staging Systems for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Era of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy.
Liang ZG; Chen XQ; Niu ZJ; Chen KH; Li L; Qu S; Su F; Zhao W; Li Y; Pan XB; Zhu XD
PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168470. PubMed ID: 27973544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
