These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10422064)

  • 1. [Estimate of the sample size in economic evaluations of drugs].
    Soto J
    Med Clin (Barc); 1999 Jun; 112(20):797. PubMed ID: 10422064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian approach for incorporating economic factors in sample size design for clinical trials of individual drugs and portfolios of drugs.
    Patel NR; Ankolekar S
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4976-88. PubMed ID: 17579924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. US policy keeps drugs out of reach in clinical trials abroad.
    Check E
    Nat Med; 2005 May; 11(5):460. PubMed ID: 15875037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The cost of innovative drugs].
    Reggio S
    Recenti Prog Med; 1999; 90(7-8):371-2. PubMed ID: 10429514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the Gould-Shih procedure for sample size re-estimation.
    Waksman JA
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 17133631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian sample size calculations for a non-inferiority test of two proportions in clinical trials.
    Daimon T
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jul; 29(4):507-16. PubMed ID: 18201944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flexible two-stage design with sample size reassessment for survival trials.
    Desseaux K; Porcher R
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5002-13. PubMed ID: 17577242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size calculations for comparative clinical trials with over-dispersed Poisson process data.
    Matsui S
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(9):1339-56. PubMed ID: 15568188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Conducting a cost-effectiveness trial in oncology: justification and method].
    Lejeune C; Binquet C; Bonnetain F
    Bull Cancer; 2009 May; 96(5):603-7. PubMed ID: 19435689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re: "Ethics and sample size".
    Halpern SD; Karlawish JH; Berlin JA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Jul; 162(2):195-6; author reply 196. PubMed ID: 15972938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robust Bayesian sample size determination in clinical trials.
    Brutti P; De Santis F; Gubbiotti S
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2290-306. PubMed ID: 18205170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptive, group sequential and decision theoretic approaches to sample size determination.
    Mehta CR; Patel NR
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3250-69; discussion 3297-301, 3302-4, 3313-4, 3326-47. PubMed ID: 16927402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size calculation in survival trials accounting for time-varying relationship between noncompliance and risk of outcome event.
    Li B; Grambsch P
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(4):349-59. PubMed ID: 17060209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An opportunity cost approach to sample size calculation in cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Gafni A; Walter SD; Birch S; Sendi P
    Health Econ; 2008 Jan; 17(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 17497751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resurrection men dig through the drug graveyard: ARYx revives problem blockbuster drugs.
    Wolfson W
    Chem Biol; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1155-6. PubMed ID: 16298292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the reference scaled bioequivalence semi-replicate method with other approaches: focus on human exposure to drugs.
    Karalis V; Symillides M; Macheras P
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Aug; 38(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 19524039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the statistical power for multiple tests: a case study.
    Yeo A; Qu Y
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 18381588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A SAS macro for sample size adjustment and randomization test for internal pilot study.
    Wang S; Xia J; Yu L; Li C; Xu L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Apr; 90(1):66-88. PubMed ID: 18192069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of adaptive sample size adjustment with respect to stopping criteria and time of interim analysis.
    Jahn-Eimermacher A; Hommel G
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1450-61. PubMed ID: 16900553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The right to a trial: Should dying patients have access to experimental drugs?
    Groopman J
    New Yorker; 2006 Dec; ():40-7. PubMed ID: 17176539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.