BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10422407)

  • 1. Radiographic trends of dental offices and dental schools.
    Suleiman OH; Spelic DC; Conway B; Hart JC; Boyce PR; Antonsen RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Jul; 130(7):1104-10. PubMed ID: 10422407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation dose-reduction techniques in North American dental schools.
    Geist JR; Katz JO
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Apr; 93(4):496-505. PubMed ID: 12029291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends survey of abdomen and lumbosacral spine radiography.
    Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Suleiman OH
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 15220497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
    MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceived quality of radiographic images after rapid processing of D- and F-speed direct-exposure intraoral x-ray films.
    Bernstein DI; Clark SJ; Scheetz JP; Farman AG; Rosenson B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 14561976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
    Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survey of radiologic practices among dental practitioners.
    Goren AD; Sciubba JJ; Friedman R; Malamud H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Apr; 67(4):464-8. PubMed ID: 2726208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nationwide surveys of chest, abdomen, lumbosacral spine radiography, and upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy: a summary of findings.
    Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Hilohi MC; Moyal AE
    Health Phys; 2010 Mar; 98(3):498-514. PubMed ID: 20147791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic materials, methods, and film-ordering patterns among orthodontic educators and private practitioners.
    Tyndall DA; Turner SP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 2301303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographic screening examination: frequency, equipment, and film in general dental practice in Denmark.
    Hintze H
    Scand J Dent Res; 1993 Feb; 101(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8441898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dental radiographic exposure normalization program (DENT). The experience in Nassau County, NY.
    Goren AD; Sciubba JJ; Moskowitz GW; Mehta S; Theesfeld RL
    N Y State Dent J; 1993; 59(7):49-51. PubMed ID: 8371883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; White SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Questionnaire survey on the use of dental X-ray film and equipment among general practitioners in the Swedish Public Dental Health Service.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1995 Aug; 53(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 7484105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of radiographic techniques and equipment used by a sample of general dental practitioners.
    Bohay RN; Kogon SL; Stephens RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Dec; 78(6):806-10. PubMed ID: 7898915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of storage conditions on film characteristics of Ektaspeed plus and Ultra-speed films.
    Platin E; Nesbit SP; Ludlow JB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Feb; 130(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 10036844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A radiographic method for measuring radiation dose based on beam quality.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Geraets WG; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):287-92. PubMed ID: 9879218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.