These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10424186)

  • 1. Effects of box features on spine loading during warehouse order selecting.
    Marras WS; Granata KP; Davis KG; Allread WG; Jorgensen MJ
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):980-96. PubMed ID: 10424186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of spinal loading through the use of handles.
    Davis KG; Marras WS; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1155-68. PubMed ID: 9715674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spinal loading when lifting from industrial storage bins.
    Ferguson SA; Gaudes-MacLaren LL; Marras WS; Waters TR; Davis KG
    Ergonomics; 2002 May; 45(6):399-414. PubMed ID: 12061965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.
    Chany AM; Parakkat J; Yang G; Burr DL; Marras WS
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 16651224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands.
    Marras WS; Davis KG
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):817-34. PubMed ID: 9629066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spine loading and trunk kinematics during team lifting.
    Marras WS; Davis KG; Kirking BC; Granata KP
    Ergonomics; 1999 Oct; 42(10):1258-73. PubMed ID: 10582500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1187-99. PubMed ID: 10503053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating reduced bag weight as an effective risk mediator for mason tenders.
    Davis KG; Kotowski SE; Albers J; Marras WS
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Oct; 41(6):822-31. PubMed ID: 20206915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Load spatial pathway and spine loading: how does lift origin and destination influence low back response?
    Davis K; Marras W
    Ergonomics; 2005 Jun; 48(8):1031-46. PubMed ID: 16147419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task.
    Gallagher S; Marras WS; Davis KG; Kovacs K
    Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):380-98. PubMed ID: 12028722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic biomechanical modelling of symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks in restricted postures.
    Gallagher S; Hamrick CA; Love AC; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1289-310. PubMed ID: 7925254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of ship motion on spinal loading during manual lifting.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; Delleman NJ; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2008 Sep; 51(9):1426-40. PubMed ID: 18802823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in trunk dynamics and spine loading during repeated trunk exertions.
    Marras WS; Granata KP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Nov; 22(21):2564-70. PubMed ID: 9383866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of lift frequency, lift duration and work experience on discomfort reporting.
    Parakkat J; Yang G; Chany AM; Burr D; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2007 Mar; 50(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 17536776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to lift a box that is too large to fit between the knees.
    Kingma I; Faber GS; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2010 Oct; 53(10):1228-38. PubMed ID: 20865606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Workplace design guidelines for asymptomatic vs. low-back-injured workers.
    Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Burr D
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Jan; 36(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 15627426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of a stiff lifting belt on spine compression during lifting.
    Kingma I; Faber GS; Suwarganda EK; Bruijnen TB; Peters RJ; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(22):E833-9. PubMed ID: 17047531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing.
    Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19111950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.