These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10424696)

  • 1. Noise affects speech-signal processing differently in the cerebral hemispheres.
    Shtyrov Y; Kujala T; Ilmoniemi RJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroreport; 1999 Jul; 10(10):2189-92. PubMed ID: 10424696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Background acoustic noise and the hemispheric lateralization of speech processing in the human brain: magnetic mismatch negativity study.
    Shtyrov Y; Kujala T; Ahveninen J; Tervaniemi M; Alku P; Ilmoniemi RJ; Näätänen R
    Neurosci Lett; 1998 Jul; 251(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 9718994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context modulates processing of speech sounds in the right auditory cortex of human subjects.
    Kujala A; Alho K; Valle S; Sivonen P; Ilmoniemi RJ; Alku P; Näätänen R
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Oct; 331(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 12361848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional changes in inter- and intra-hemispheric cortical processing underlying degraded speech perception.
    Bidelman GM; Howell M
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):581-590. PubMed ID: 26386346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsiveness to repeated speech stimuli persists in left but not right auditory cortex.
    Teismann IK; Sörös P; Manemann E; Ross B; Pantev C; Knecht S
    Neuroreport; 2004 Jun; 15(8):1267-70. PubMed ID: 15167546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory cortex evoked magnetic fields and lateralization of speech processing.
    Shtyrov Y; Kujala T; Lyytinen H; Ilmoniemi RJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroreport; 2000 Sep; 11(13):2893-6. PubMed ID: 11006961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The neural basis of sublexical speech and corresponding nonspeech processing: a combined EEG-MEG study.
    Kuuluvainen S; Nevalainen P; Sorokin A; Mittag M; Partanen E; Putkinen V; Seppänen M; Kähkönen S; Kujala T
    Brain Lang; 2014 Mar; 130():19-32. PubMed ID: 24576806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemispheric asymmetries in auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields in response to place of articulation contrasts.
    Gage NM; Roberts TP; Hickok G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Aug; 14(2):303-6. PubMed ID: 12067704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemispheric lateralization of the processing of consonant-vowel syllables (formant transitions): effects of stimulus characteristics and attentional demands on evoked magnetic fields.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(12):1902-17. PubMed ID: 12207989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA; Sharma M; Bradford M; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term exposure to occupational noise alters the cortical organization of sound processing.
    Brattico E; Kujala T; Tervaniemi M; Alku P; Ambrosi L; Monitillo V
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):190-203. PubMed ID: 15589197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Specialization of left auditory cortex for speech perception in man depends on temporal coding.
    Liégeois-Chauvel C; de Graaf JB; Laguitton V; Chauvel P
    Cereb Cortex; 1999; 9(5):484-96. PubMed ID: 10450893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of viewing speech on auditory speech processing is different in the left and right hemispheres.
    Davis C; Kislyuk D; Kim J; Sams M
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():151-61. PubMed ID: 18538750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electromagnetic recordings reveal latency differences in speech and tone processing in humans.
    Tiitinen H; Sivonen P; Alku P; Virtanen J; Näätänen R
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1999 Oct; 8(3):355-63. PubMed ID: 10556611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinct gamma-band evoked responses to speech and non-speech sounds in humans.
    Palva S; Palva JM; Shtyrov Y; Kujala T; Ilmoniemi RJ; Kaila K; Näätänen R
    J Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 22(4):RC211. PubMed ID: 11844845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemispheric balance in coding speech and non-speech sounds in Chinese participants.
    Lin YY; Chen WT; Liao KK; Yeh TC; Wu ZA; Ho LT
    Neuroreport; 2005 Apr; 16(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 15770153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory evoked fields differentially encode speech features: an MEG investigation of the P50m and N100m time courses during syllable processing.
    Tavabi K; Obleser J; Dobel C; Pantev C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 May; 25(10):3155-62. PubMed ID: 17561829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.