These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10424976)
1. Reliability of an ear-bow arbitrary face-bow transfer instrument. Choi DG; Bowley JF; Marx DB; Lee S J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 10424976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant. Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Face-bow record without a third point of reference: theoretical considerations and an alternative technique. Ercoli C; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Galindo D J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 10424992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of two arbitrary face-bow transfer systems for orthognathic surgery planning. Bamber MA; Firouzal R; Harris M; Linney A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Oct; 25(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 8961011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single step approach to make diagnostic impressions of both the arches and face bow transfer: a novel technique. Komuravelli AK; Suresh Sajjan MC Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 22842240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional assessment of the reliability of a postural face-bow transfer. Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Schmitz JH J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Feb; 87(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 11854679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Occlusal errors generated at the maxillary incisal edge position related to discrepancies in the arbitrary horizontal axis location and to the thickness of the interocclusal record. Kois JC; Kois DE; Chaiyabutr Y J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 23998625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of face-bow transfer: effect on surgical prediction and postsurgical result. Ellis E; Tharanon W; Gambrell K J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Jun; 50(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 1593315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study between 2 methods of mounting models in semiadjustable articulator for orthognathic surgery. Mayrink G; Sawazaki R; Asprino L; de Moraes M; Fernandes Moreira RW J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2879-82. PubMed ID: 21496992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of an improved orthognathic articulator system: 1. Accuracy of cast orientation. Paul PE; Barbenel JC; Walker FS; Khambay BS; Moos KF; Ayoub AF Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 22047955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of face-bow transfer for the planning of orthognathic surgery. Zizelmann C; Hammer B; Gellrich NC; Schwestka-Polly R; Rana M; Bucher P J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1944-50. PubMed ID: 22079061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative tests of arbitrary and kinematic transverse horizontal axis recordings of mandibular movements. Bernhardt O; Küppers N; Rosin M; Meyer G J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 12616238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]