These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10424987)

  • 1. Two-body in vitro wear study of some current dental composites and amalgams.
    Hu X; Marquis PM; Shortall AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 10424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of cyclic loading on occlusal contact area wear of composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Teoh SH; Chew CL
    Dent Mater; 2002 Mar; 18(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 11755594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator.
    Yap AU; Ong LF; Teoh SH; Hastings GW
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Mar; 26(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 10194732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-body wear of dental composites under different loads.
    Marquis PM; Hu X; Shortall AC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 11203672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of filler loading on the two-body wear of a dental composite.
    Hu X; Marquis PM; Shortall AC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jul; 30(7):729-37. PubMed ID: 12791160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro investigation of the performance of different restorative materials under cast circumferential clasps for removable dental prostheses.
    Pospiech P; Nagel F; Gebhart F; Nothdurft FP; Mitov G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Dec; 16(6):1659-67. PubMed ID: 22173722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro contact wear of dental composites.
    Nagarajan VS; Jahanmir S; Thompson VP
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jan; 20(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 14698775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.
    Shabanian M; Richards LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 12131888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occlusal contact area (OCA) wear of two new composite restoratives.
    Yap AU
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Feb; 29(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 11856400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the abrasive wear resistance between amalgams, hybrid composite material and different dental cements.
    Gil FJ; Espias A; Sánchez LA; Planell JA
    Int Dent J; 1999 Dec; 49(6):337-42. PubMed ID: 10907431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of fiber volume fraction and length on the wear characteristics of glass fiber-reinforced dental composites.
    Callaghan DJ; Vaziri A; Nayeb-Hashemi H
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 16002133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the wear resistance of packable composite equal that of dental amalgam?
    Suzuki S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(6):355-65; discussion 365-7. PubMed ID: 15801341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of occlusal loading and mechanical properties of resin composite on stress generated in posterior restorations.
    Bicalho AA; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Am J Dent; 2014 Jun; 27(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 25208359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two- and three-body wear of composite resins.
    Koottathape N; Takahashi H; Iwasaki N; Kanehira M; Finger WJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1261-70. PubMed ID: 23083806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Localized three-body wear of resin composites.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():19-27. PubMed ID: 8935090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resistance to condensation of 'condensable' resin composites as evaluated by a mechanical test.
    Brackett WW; Covey DA
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):424-6. PubMed ID: 11203851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear.
    Lazaridou D; Belli R; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1485-92. PubMed ID: 25491442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wear of enamel cusps opposed by posterior composite resin.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):885-90. PubMed ID: 20830885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wear model simulating clinical abrasion on composite filling materials.
    Johnsen GF; Taxt-Lamolle SF; Haugen HJ
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(5):739-48. PubMed ID: 21946496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.