BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10424992)

  • 1. Face-bow record without a third point of reference: theoretical considerations and an alternative technique.
    Ercoli C; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Galindo D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 10424992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 1 face bow.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):567-72. PubMed ID: 18462852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A reevaluation of the axis-orbital plane and the use of orbitale in a facebow transfer record.
    Pitchford JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 1800732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 2 articulator.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):573-8. PubMed ID: 18462853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study between 2 methods of mounting models in semiadjustable articulator for orthognathic surgery.
    Mayrink G; Sawazaki R; Asprino L; de Moraes M; Fernandes Moreira RW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2879-82. PubMed ID: 21496992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of face-bow transfer: effect on surgical prediction and postsurgical result.
    Ellis E; Tharanon W; Gambrell K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Jun; 50(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 1593315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional assessment of the reliability of a postural face-bow transfer.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Schmitz JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Feb; 87(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 11854679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of an ear-bow arbitrary face-bow transfer instrument.
    Choi DG; Bowley JF; Marx DB; Lee S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 10424976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single step approach to make diagnostic impressions of both the arches and face bow transfer: a novel technique.
    Komuravelli AK; Suresh Sajjan MC
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 22842240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geometric analysis of occlusal plane orientation using simulated ear-rod facebow transfer.
    dos Santos Júnior J; Nelson SJ; Nummikoski P
    J Prosthodont; 1996 Sep; 5(3):172-81. PubMed ID: 9028221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of face-bow transfer for the planning of orthognathic surgery.
    Zizelmann C; Hammer B; Gellrich NC; Schwestka-Polly R; Rana M; Bucher P
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1944-50. PubMed ID: 22079061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Angle between occlusal plane and horizontal plane of articulators with quick mounting face bow].
    Celebić A; Kraljević K; Valentić-Peruzović M; Zivković Z; Stipetić J
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 1989; 23(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 2635567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Kois Dento-Facial Analyzer System with an earbow for mounting a maxillary cast.
    Lux LH; Thompson GA; Waliszewski KJ; Ziebert GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 25979448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of 3 methods of face-bow transfer recording: implications for orthognathic surgery.
    Gateno J; Forrest KK; Camp B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 59(6):635-40; discussion 640-1. PubMed ID: 11381385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Errors in mounting maxillary casts using face-bow records as a result of an anatomical variation.
    Chow TW; Clark RK; Cooke MS
    J Dent; 1985 Dec; 13(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 3866768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer simulation of occlusal discrepancies resulting from different mounting techniques.
    Piehslinger E; Bauer W; Schmiedmayer HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Sep; 74(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 7473282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Condylar guidance: correlation between protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographic image: a pilot study.
    Tannamala PK; Pulagam M; Pottem SR; Swapna B
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 22339685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative analysis of edentulous patients treated traditionally and with the use of a face-bow and Quick Master articulator].
    Kubrak J
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1998; 44():237-49. PubMed ID: 9857542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the performance of various virtual articulator mounting procedures: a self-controlled clinical study.
    Lin H; Pan Y; Wei X; Wang Y; Yu H; Cheng H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):4017-4028. PubMed ID: 37247089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.