These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10425244)

  • 1. Comparison of different doses of iohexol with amidotrizoate for excretory urography in cats.
    Agut A; Murciano J; Sanchez-Valverde MA; Laredo FG; Tovar MC
    Res Vet Sci; 1999 Aug; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 10425244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The adverse effects of the water-soluble iodinated contrast media used in excretory urography in the canine species].
    Hita Rosino E; Agut Giménez A; Sánchez-Valverde García MA
    Actas Urol Esp; 1999 May; 23(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 10427811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media.
    Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):657-60. PubMed ID: 1535877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Excretory urography with iohexol: evaluation in children.
    Magill HL; Clarke EA; Fitch SJ; Boulden TF; Ramirez R; Siegle RL; Somes GW
    Radiology; 1986 Dec; 161(3):625-30. PubMed ID: 3786708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-dose low-osmolar urography with iohexol.
    Gupta R; Airon RK
    Urol Int; 2003; 71(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 12890963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Complement activation after the intravascular administration of contrast media: a comparison between ionic and nonionic x-ray contrast media].
    Hoffmeister HM; Fuhrer G; Platten HP; Heller W
    Rofo; 1987 Dec; 147(6):673-5. PubMed ID: 2827265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. A double-blind randomized study comparing an aqueous solution of amidotrizoate, an aqueous solution of iohexol and a viscous solution of iohexol.
    Lönnemark M; Magnusson A; Ahlström H
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 8369192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of a non-ionic dimer, iodixanol with a non-ionic monomer, iohexol in low dose intravenous urography.
    Skehan SJ; Rasmussen F; Gibney RG; Lindequist S; Moller-Nielsen S; Svaland MG; Kampenes VB; Bjartveit K; Greaney T; Carlsen SD; Masterson J
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):910-7. PubMed ID: 10195003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Split-bolus CT urography with synchronous nephrographic and excretory phase in dogs: comparison of image quality with three-phase CT urography and optimal allocation ratio of contrast medium.
    Je H; Lee SK; Jung JW; Jang Y; Chhoey S; Choi J
    J Vet Sci; 2020 Jul; 21(4):e55. PubMed ID: 32735093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
    Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P
    Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative study on nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents for drip infused urography].
    Sugaya K; Nishizawa O; Noto H; Suzuki T; Shimoda N; Miyagata S; Harada T; Tsuchida S
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1992 Jul; 38(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 1524001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Iodixanol in paediatric excretory urography: efficiency and safety compared to iohexol.
    Dacher J; Sirinelli D; Boscq M; Hassan M; Garel C; Chateil JF; Amar C
    Pediatr Radiol; 1998 Feb; 28(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 9472058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Excretory urography: comparison of the ionic contrast medium amidotrezoic acid with the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol].
    Grabenwöger F; Dock W; Pinterits F; Metz V
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1989 Feb; 139(3):48-50. PubMed ID: 2650470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R
    Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Excretion of urographic contrast media. II. Ioxhexol and sodium diatrizoate during ureteric stasis in the rabbit.
    Sjöberg S; Golman K; Almén T
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980; 362():99-104. PubMed ID: 6267901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-dose clinical urography with the low-osmolality contrast agent Hexabrix: comparison with a conventional contrast agent.
    Spataro RF; Katzberg RW; Fischer HW; McMannis MJ
    Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 3538156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The optimum dose of iohexol 399 in excretory urography].
    Ohshima S; Matsuura O; Takeuchi N; Hattori R; Hashimoto J; Segawa A
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1989 Aug; 35(8):1457-62. PubMed ID: 2683658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of urograms in infants: a comparison of sodium diatrizoate, metrizamide and iohexol.
    Rawlinson J; Hyde I; Williams J
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jul; 61(727):592-5. PubMed ID: 3408847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in intravenous urography: clinical trial in 1,000 consecutive patients.
    Jacobsson BF; Jorulf H; Kalantar MS; Narasimham DL
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):601-5. PubMed ID: 3283830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.