These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10425945)

  • 1. Endodontic complications of root canal therapy performed by dental students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files.
    Pettiette MT; Metzger Z; Phillips C; Trope M
    J Endod; 1999 Apr; 25(4):230-34. PubMed ID: 10425945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between a hand stainless-steel K file and a rotary NiTi 0.04 taper.
    Namazikhah MS; Mokhlis HR; Alasmakh K
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 28(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 11324127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of procedural errors resulting during root canal preparations completed by senior dental students in patients using an '8-step method' versus 'serial step-back technique'.
    Kfir A; Rosenberg E; Zuckerman O; Tamse A; Fuss Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Jun; 97(6):745-8. PubMed ID: 15184858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
    Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators.
    Gluskin AH; Brown DC; Buchanan LS
    Int Endod J; 2001 Sep; 34(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 11556516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files.
    Pettiette MT; Delano EO; Trope M
    J Endod; 2001 Feb; 27(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 11491636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
    Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shaping of curved root canals instrumented with stainless steel and nickel titanium files.
    Atlas DM; Leonardi L; Raiden G
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2005; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 16302457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments.
    Esposito PT; Cunningham CJ
    J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):173-6. PubMed ID: 7673815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium K-files in curved root canals.
    Chan AW; Cheung GS
    Int Endod J; 1996 Nov; 29(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 10332236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique.
    Chen JL; Messer HH
    Aust Dent J; 2002 Mar; 47(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 12035951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.
    Moore J; Fitz-Walter P; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2009 Dec; 42(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 19912375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of root-canal shaping with stainless steel and rotary NiTi files performed by preclinical dental students.
    Alrahabi M
    Technol Health Care; 2015; 23(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 25669210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hand and nickel-titanium root canal instrumentation performed by dental students: a micro-computed tomographic study.
    Peru M; Peru C; Mannocci F; Sherriff M; Buchanan LS; Pitt Ford TR
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Feb; 10(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16436085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effect of coronal preflaring on the instrumentation of curved premolar canals.].
    Gu YX; Zhu YQ; DU R
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Oct; 13(5):403-7. PubMed ID: 15514867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study.
    Schäfer E; Schulz-Bongert U; Tulus G
    J Endod; 2004 Jun; 30(6):432-5. PubMed ID: 15167474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography.
    Gambill JM; Alder M; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1996 Jul; 22(7):369-75. PubMed ID: 8935064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.