These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10425952)

  • 1. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals.
    Burger CL; Mork TO; Hutter JW; Nicoll B
    J Endod; 1999 Apr; 25(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 10425952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography.
    Mentes A; Gencoglu N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Jan; 93(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 11805781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of two root canal length measurement devices integrated into rotary endodontic motors when removing gutta-percha from root-filled teeth.
    Uzun O; Topuz O; Tinaz C; Nekoofar MH; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2008 Sep; 41(9):725-32. PubMed ID: 18637852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The evaluation of the ability of Apex D.S.P. to determine the length of root canal. In vitro study].
    Lewińska E; Lipski M; Marciniak-Paradowska M; Woźniak K; Lichota D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 19374229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Hedrick RT; Dove SB; Peters DD; McDavid WD
    J Endod; 1994 Jul; 20(7):320-6. PubMed ID: 7996092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the canal contents on the electrical assisted determination of the length of root canals.
    Pommer O; Stamm O; Attin T
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):83-5. PubMed ID: 11833694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro comparison of 10 radiographic methods for working length estimation.
    Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K; Czajka J
    Int Endod J; 1995 May; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 8626199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of the distance between the minor foramen and the anatomic apex by digital and conventional radiography.
    Melius B; Jiang J; Zhu Q
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11833685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A comparative evaluation of Apex D.S.P. and Root ZX Apex locators. An in vitro study].
    Lipski M; Woźniak K; Lichota D; Jamroszczyk K; Nowicka A; Góra M; Trabska-Swistelnicka M; Sobolewska E; Tomasik M; Buczkowska-Radlińiska J
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):33-6. PubMed ID: 19374228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a digital measurement tool to estimate working length in endodontics.
    Lamus F; Katz JO; Glaros AG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2001 Feb; 2(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12167941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Roentgenographic investigation of frequency and degree of canal curvatures in human permanent teeth.
    Schäfer E; Diez C; Hoppe W; Tepel J
    J Endod; 2002 Mar; 28(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 12017184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [New electric techniques for root canal length measurement].
    Voss A
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Apr; 45(4):219-22. PubMed ID: 2257831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linear measurements to determine working length of curved canals with fine files: conventional versus digital radiography.
    Brito-Júnior M; Santos LA; Baleeiro EN; Pêgo MM; Eleutério NB; Camilo CC
    J Oral Sci; 2009 Dec; 51(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 20032608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A mathematically based classification of root canal curvatures on natural human teeth.
    Nagy CD; Szabó J; Szabó J
    J Endod; 1995 Nov; 21(11):557-60. PubMed ID: 8601766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
    Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of E-speed film for root canal length determination.
    Powell-Cullingford AW; Pitt Ford TR
    Int Endod J; 1993 Sep; 26(5):268-72. PubMed ID: 8300258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of root-canal measurements with conventional and digital radiology.
    Lozano A; Forner L; Llena C
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):542-50. PubMed ID: 12190912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working length determination in palatal roots of maxillary molars.
    Kim-Park MA; Baughan LW; Hartwell GR
    J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 12540223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of three different root canal curvature measurement techniques and measuring the canal access angle in curved canals.
    Günday M; Sazak H; Garip Y
    J Endod; 2005 Nov; 31(11):796-8. PubMed ID: 16249721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.