BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10426257)

  • 1. A prospective follow up study of women with colposcopically unconfirmed positive cervical smears.
    Milne DS; Wadehra V; Mennim D; Wagstaff TI
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Jan; 106(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 10426257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
    al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
    J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate referral to colposcopy versus cytological surveillance for minor cervical cytological abnormalities in the absence of HPV test.
    Kyrgiou M; Kalliala IE; Mitra A; Fotopoulou C; Ghaem-Maghami S; Martin-Hirsch PP; Cruickshank M; Arbyn M; Paraskevaidis E
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jan; 1(1):CD009836. PubMed ID: 28125861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-risk HPV testing in women with borderline and mild dyskaryosis: long-term follow-up data and clinical relevance.
    Denise Zielinski G; Snijders PJ; Rozendaal L; Voorhorst FJ; Runsink AP; de Schipper FA; Meijer CJ
    J Pathol; 2001 Oct; 195(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 11673826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Mayeaux EJ; Harper MB; Abreo F; Pope JB; Phillips GS
    J Fam Pract; 1995 Jan; 40(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7807039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome analysis of 4 years' follow-up of patients referred for colposcopy with one smear showing mild dyskaryosis.
    Ahmed AS; Goumalatsos G; Akbar N; Lawton FG; Savvas M
    Cytopathology; 2008 Apr; 19(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 17937774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.
    Flannelly G; Anderson D; Kitchener HC; Mann EM; Campbell M; Fisher P; Walker F; Templeton AA
    BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8019248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.
    Fletcher A; Metaxas N; Grubb C; Chamberlain J
    BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy?
    Soutter WP; Wisdom S; Brough AK; Monaghan JM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Jan; 93(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 3942709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
    Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of human papillomavirus testing in the management of women with low-grade abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Cotton S; Sharp L; Little J; Cruickshank M; Seth R; Smart L; Duncan I; Harrild K; Neal K; Waugh N;
    BJOG; 2010 May; 117(6):645-59. PubMed ID: 20374607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Triage of patients with abnormal cervical smears in the absence of colposcopy.
    Omigbodun AO; Thomas JO; Adewole IF; Ogunlusi ML
    Trop Geogr Med; 1993; 45(4):157-8. PubMed ID: 7694409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    TOMBOLA Group
    BMJ; 2009 Jul; 339():b2546. PubMed ID: 19638646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The inadequate smear: does it matter?
    Bhaumik J; Morris PG; Beer HR; Fielder H; Coles EC; Leeson S
    Cytopathology; 2004 Oct; 15(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 15456415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is human papillomavirus testing an effective triage method for detection of high-grade (grade 2 or 3) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
    Adam E; Kaufman RH; Berkova Z; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1235-44. PubMed ID: 9662307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome of women with index smear showing mild dyskaryosis: effects of age and evidence of HPV infection.
    Winn CM; Jones H
    Cytopathology; 2005 Dec; 16(6):281-9. PubMed ID: 16303041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical cytology: use and follow-up.
    Hurt WG
    J Fam Pract; 1978 Sep; 7(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 690590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A long-term study of women with normal colposcopy after referral with low-grade cytological abnormalities.
    Smith MC; Keech SE; Perryman K; Soutter WP
    BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1321-8. PubMed ID: 17059394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relation of human papillomavirus status to cervical lesions and consequences for cervical-cancer screening: a prospective study.
    Nobbenhuis MA; Walboomers JM; Helmerhorst TJ; Rozendaal L; Remmink AJ; Risse EK; van der Linden HC; Voorhorst FJ; Kenemans P; Meijer CJ
    Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9172):20-5. PubMed ID: 10406360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.