These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10426639)

  • 1. An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section.
    Graham WJ; Hundley V; McCheyne AL; Hall MH; Gurney E; Milne J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Mar; 106(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10426639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Women's involvement with the decision preceding their caesarean section and their degree of satisfaction.
    Mould TA; Chong S; Spencer JA; Gallivan S
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Nov; 103(11):1074-7. PubMed ID: 8916991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: A qualitative study.
    Moffat MA; Bell JS; Porter MA; Lawton S; Hundley V; Danielian P; Bhattacharya S
    BJOG; 2007 Jan; 114(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17233863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Questionnaire survey on women's views after a first caesarean delivery in two tertiary centres in Ireland and their preference for involvement in a future randomised trial on mode of birth.
    Ryan G; O Doherty KC; Devane D; McAuliffe F; Morrison J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e031766. PubMed ID: 31585976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks.
    Emmett CL; Shaw AR; Montgomery AA; Murphy DJ;
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1438-45. PubMed ID: 17081180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How much influence do women in Sweden have on caesarean section? A follow-up study of women's preferences in early pregnancy.
    Hildingsson I
    Midwifery; 2008 Mar; 24(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 17197058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Women's views on elective primary caesarean section.
    Pakenham S; Chamberlain SM; Smith GN
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2006 Dec; 28(12):1089-1094. PubMed ID: 17169232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.
    Karlström A; Nystedt A; Johansson M; Hildingsson I
    Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 20630634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'Off everyone's radar': Australian women's experiences of medically necessary elective caesarean section.
    Bayes S; Fenwick J; Hauck Y
    Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e900-9. PubMed ID: 22341090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Women's role and satisfaction in the decision to have a caesarean section.
    Turnbull DA; Wilkinson C; Yaser A; Carty V; Svigos JM; Robinson JS
    Med J Aust; 1999 Jun; 170(12):580-3. PubMed ID: 10416426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.
    Bonzon M; Gross MM; Karch A; Grylka-Baeschlin S
    Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():219-227. PubMed ID: 28478374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Caesarean section at maternal request--the differing views of patients and healthcare professionals: a questionnaire based study.
    Sharpe AN; Waring GJ; Rees J; McGarry K; Hinshaw K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Sep; 192():54-60. PubMed ID: 26151240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Information for women after CS: are they getting enough?
    Lucas A
    RCM Midwives; 2004 Nov; 7(11):472-5. PubMed ID: 15612178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influences on decision making among primiparous women choosing elective caesarean section in the absence of medical indications: findings from a qualitative investigation.
    Kornelsen J; Hutton E; Munro S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Oct; 32(10):962-9. PubMed ID: 21176305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 'What about the mother?' Women's and caregivers' perspectives on caesarean birth in a low-resource setting with rising caesarean section rates.
    Litorp H; Mgaya A; Kidanto HL; Johnsdotter S; Essén B
    Midwifery; 2015 Jul; 31(7):713-20. PubMed ID: 25886967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Absence of conception after caesarean section: voluntary or involuntary?
    Bhattacharya S; Porter M; Harrild K; Naji A; Mollison J; van Teijlingen E; Campbell DM; Hall MH; Templeton A
    BJOG; 2006 Mar; 113(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 16487197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods.
    Béhague DP; Victora CG; Barros FC
    BMJ; 2002 Apr; 324(7343):942-5. PubMed ID: 11964338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sterilisation during unplanned caesarean sections for women likely to have a completed family--should they be offered? Experience in a country with limited health resources.
    Verkuyl DA
    BJOG; 2002 Aug; 109(8):900-4. PubMed ID: 12197369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A qualitative study to explore the attitudes of women and obstetricians towards caesarean delivery in rural Bangladesh.
    Begum T; Ellis C; Sarker M; Rostoker JF; Rahman A; Anwar I; Reichenbach L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Sep; 18(1):368. PubMed ID: 30208874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and caesarean birth.
    Gungor I; Beji NK
    Midwifery; 2012 Jun; 28(3):348-57. PubMed ID: 21546142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.