These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10426722)

  • 1. Max-Planck Society investigates misconduct.
    Tuffs A
    BMJ; 1999 Jul; 319(7205):274. PubMed ID: 10426722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific misconduct. Researcher rebuked for 20-year-old misdeed.
    Hagmann M
    Science; 1999 Dec; 286(5448):2249-50. PubMed ID: 10636777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Panel proposes ways to combat fraud.
    Koenig R
    Science; 1997 Dec; 278(5346):2049-50. PubMed ID: 9432714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific misconduct in medical research.
    Verma BL; Shukla GD
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 90(8):222-5. PubMed ID: 1460306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific misconduct. Psychologists rethink Burt.
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6364):5. PubMed ID: 1538780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Conduct unbecoming--the MRC's approach.
    Evans I
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1728-9. PubMed ID: 9652921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. UK's failure to act on research misconduct.
    Farthing M; Horton R; Smith R
    Lancet; 2000 Dec; 356(9247):2030. PubMed ID: 11145487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives.
    Chantler C; Chantler S
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1731-2. PubMed ID: 9652923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. UK declaration made on research misconduct.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1999 Nov; 354(9190):1623. PubMed ID: 11658054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. UK agency to combat research misconduct.
    White C
    BMJ; 2005 Mar; 330(7492):616. PubMed ID: 15774971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters.
    Farthing MJ
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research.
    Altman LK
    N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():F3. PubMed ID: 11647563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The code of silence.
    Wilmshurst P
    Lancet; 1997 Feb; 349(9051):567-9. PubMed ID: 9048805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. British editors form misconduct panel.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cheating charge rocks malaria research.
    Sattaur O
    New Sci; 1983 Feb; 97(1345):423. PubMed ID: 11655505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Their learned friends: was a scientific society really a front for one of the world's biggest tobacco firms?
    Concar D
    New Sci; 1998 May; 158(2134):5. PubMed ID: 11656716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fraud inquiries.
    Campbell PN; Taverne J
    Nature; 1993 Feb; 361(6414):676. PubMed ID: 11643098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the scientific misconduct hearing process.
    Parrish DM
    JAMA; 1997 Apr 23-30; 277(16):1315-9. PubMed ID: 9109472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Was the paper I wrote a fraud?
    Bowie C
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1755-6. PubMed ID: 11682718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research fraud.
    Lock S
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1992 Mar; 74B(2):173-4. PubMed ID: 11654313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.