These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Human rights begin at home. BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7120):1387. PubMed ID: 11645004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Research fraud: discouraging the others. Lock S BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6765):1348. PubMed ID: 11642809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Perceptions concerning research integrity and the practice of data audit in the biotechnology industry. Glick JL Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):187-95. PubMed ID: 11652294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research. Wells F Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):25-38. PubMed ID: 11654814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: is it prejudicial to patient safety? Wells F Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev; 1992; 11(4):241-55. PubMed ID: 11652183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Deceit in science: does it really matter? Birch AJ Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Will the UK cope? Horton R Lancet; 1997 Jul; 350(9073):234. PubMed ID: 9242798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Federal agency says two universities did not provide full details in misconduct case: U.S. ex. rel. Condie v. Univ. of California, Univ. of Utah, and Ninnemann (Part III). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Sep; 11(9):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Medical and scientific fraud. Robinson RG N Z Med J; 1994 Jun; 107(979):216-7. PubMed ID: 8208480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct. Sovacool BK Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. UK launches panel to tackle research misconduct. Cole A BMJ; 2006 Apr; 332(7546):871. PubMed ID: 16613945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Wellcome survey reveals public mistrust of scientists. Dickson D Nat Med; 1999 Jan; 5(1):10. PubMed ID: 11645136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Animal research within an ethical framework. Matfield M ATLA Abstr; 1992 Apr; 20(2):334-7. PubMed ID: 11659496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. MRC launches inquiry into animal experiments. Coghlan A New Sci; 1990 Jun; 126(1720):28. PubMed ID: 11655987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Bristol study continues to cause debate. Bull Med Ethics; 1995 May; No. 108():3-5. PubMed ID: 11654278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Resnik DB Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]