These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10428235)

  • 1. The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation.
    Kummer FJ; Shah S; Iyer S; DiCesare PE
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Jun; 14(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 10428235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.
    D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.
    Widmer KH; Zurfluh B
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
    Hisatome T; Doi H
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement.
    Williams D; Royle M; Norton M
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jan; 24(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 18823742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.
    Widmer KH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acetabular Cup Anteversion and Inclination in Hip Range of Motion to Impingement.
    McCarthy TF; Alipit V; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):264-8. PubMed ID: 27067753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.
    Ohmori T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Taga T; Hasegawa K; Inoue D; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Yoshitani J; Ueno T; Tsuchiya H
    Int Orthop; 2018 May; 42(5):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 28990125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.
    Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.
    Higa M; Tanino H; Abo M; Kakunai S; Banks SA
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer simulation based on in vivo kinematics of a replaced hip during chair-rising for elucidating target cup and stem positioning with a safety range of hip rotation.
    Shiomoto K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Higaki H; Hara D; Gondo H; Komiyama K; Yoshimoto K; Harada S; Nakashima Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Jan; 91():105537. PubMed ID: 34847472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of optimal implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty based on postoperative range of motion simulation.
    Harada S; Hamai S; Motomura G; Ikemura S; Fujii M; Kawahara S; Sato T; Hara D; Nakashima Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Feb; 92():105555. PubMed ID: 35026659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation.
    Seki M; Yuasa N; Ohkuni K
    J Orthop Res; 1998 Jul; 16(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 9747795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?].
    Widmer KH
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal position of lipped acetabular liners to improve stability in total hip arthroplasty-an intraoperative in vivo study.
    Hau R; Hammeschlag J; Law C; Wang KK
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 13(1):289. PubMed ID: 30453985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15519347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The 2014 Frank Stinchfield Award: The 'landing zone' for wear and stability in total hip arthroplasty is smaller than we thought: a computational analysis.
    Elkins JM; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 473(2):441-52. PubMed ID: 25091222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of inclination and anteversion angles on kinematics and contact mechanics of dual mobility hip implants.
    Gao Y; Chen Z; Zhang Z; Chen S; Jin Z
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Aug; 57():48-55. PubMed ID: 29933214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictability of Acetabular Component Angular Change with Postural Shift from Standing to Sitting Position.
    Kanawade V; Dorr LD; Wan Z
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 96(12):978-986. PubMed ID: 24951732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Radiologic evaluation of cup placement variation in conventional total hip arthroplasty].
    Leichtle U; Gosselke N; Wirth CJ; Rudert M
    Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 17203443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.