These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10429217)

  • 1. Nasty taste from G-8 GM food policy.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Aug; 17(8):730. PubMed ID: 10429217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
    Vasil IK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GM foods debate needs a recipe for restoring trust.
    Nature; 1999 Apr; 398(6729):639. PubMed ID: 10227273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientists cry foul as Europe plays politics with GM crops.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 18259156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No Munich on GM crops.
    Malvoisin P; Grausz JD
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):1501; discussion 1501. PubMed ID: 15583648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. US, EU prepare for further biotech food dispute.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Oct; 19(10):897. PubMed ID: 11581641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Europe and US in confrontation over GM food labelling criteria.
    Masood E
    Nature; 1999 Apr; 398(6729):641. PubMed ID: 10227274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. European Commission rethinks biotech patents.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1175-6. PubMed ID: 12454654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environment regulations hinder biotech industry.
    Miller HI
    Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6796):560. PubMed ID: 10949276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Food foments European disunity.
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Dec; 15(13):1317. PubMed ID: 9415868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US reforms rules for telling public about GM food.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2000 May; 405(6783):108. PubMed ID: 10821240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rethinking US leadership in food biotechnology.
    Taylor MR
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):852-4. PubMed ID: 12894194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orphans at the window.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1055. PubMed ID: 15340451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biotech panel set up in US may help allay public fears.
    Reichhardt T
    Nature; 1999 Jun; 399(6736):508. PubMed ID: 10376584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regulation of genetic modification of organisms: science or emotion?
    Malinowski MJ
    J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 11657280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FDA not yet moved by biotech food critics.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jan; 18(1):15. PubMed ID: 10625375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Substantial equivalence: its uses and abuses.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Nov; 17(11):1042-3. PubMed ID: 10545866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Europe angers US with strict GM labeling.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):6. PubMed ID: 12511897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Europe sees sharp decline in GMO research.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):468-9. PubMed ID: 12721556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.