These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10429232)

  • 1. Canadian farmers seek compensation for "genetic pollution".
    Hoyle B
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Aug; 17(8):747. PubMed ID: 10429232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Farmer fined for growing GM seed.
    Spurgeon D
    Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6829):615. PubMed ID: 11287907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intellectual property rights in agriculture in the light of the debate on biotechnology: historical evolution and current situation.
    Gimelli F
    Ital J Biochem; 2000; 49(3-4):41-51. PubMed ID: 11508056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. USDA scrutinizes GM organism regulations.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 14990936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recipe for disaster.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):465. PubMed ID: 12721554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Putting Cartagena into practice.
    Watanabe KN; Taeb M; Okusu H
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Oct; 22(10):1207-8. PubMed ID: 15470448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Italy employs further GMO delay tactics.
    Meldolesi A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Apr; 21(4):346. PubMed ID: 12665808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Cartagena protocol and GMOs.
    Pythoud F
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Nov; 22(11):1347-8. PubMed ID: 15529146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biotechnologies and genetic resources for food and agriculture.
    Esquinas-Alcázar JT
    Forum (Genova); 1999; 9(3 Suppl 3):84-7. PubMed ID: 10607851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environment regulations hinder biotech industry.
    Miller HI
    Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6796):560. PubMed ID: 10949276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feds' approach to genetically modified products criticized.
    Sibbald B
    CMAJ; 2001 Mar; 164(6):853. PubMed ID: 11276555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biotechnology and world agriculture.
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Aug; 17(8):729. PubMed ID: 10429216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
    Vasil IK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
    Hoffman DE
    Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Agbiotech climbs Africa's agenda.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):589. PubMed ID: 12776132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patenting pieces of people.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Apr; 21(4):341. PubMed ID: 12665804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When biotech crosses borders.
    Angulo E; Gilna B
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18327233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrated farming: why organic farmers should use transgenic crops.
    Ammann K
    N Biotechnol; 2008; 25(2-3):101-7. PubMed ID: 18824150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cloning and its discontents-a Canadian perspective.
    Einsiedel EF
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):943-4. PubMed ID: 10973212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
    Smyth S; McHughen A
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.