BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10429597)

  • 1. Interface gap after implantation of a cemented femoral stem in pigs.
    Wang JS; Franzén H; Lidgren L
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1999 Jun; 70(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 10429597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiographic and histologic analysis of cemented double tapered femoral stems.
    Brumby SA; Howie DW; Pearcy MJ; Wang AW; Nawana NS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):229-37. PubMed ID: 9917608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of stem preheating and precooling on residual stress formation at stem/cement interface for cemented hip implants.
    Madrala A; Nuño N
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2010 Apr; 93(1):258-65. PubMed ID: 20091924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does stem preheating have a beneficial effect on PMMA bulk porosity in cemented THA?
    Madrala A; Nuño N; Bureau MN
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2010 Oct; 95(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 20737585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vacuum-mixing cement does not decrease overall porosity in cemented femoral stems: an in vitro laboratory investigation.
    Messick KJ; Miller MA; Damron LA; Race A; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1115-21. PubMed ID: 17785755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface.
    Bishop NE; Ferguson S; Tepic S
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 May; 78(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 8636165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [New PMMA bone cements for vacuum mixing systems].
    Schelling K; Heisel C; Schnürer SM; Mau H; Breusch SJ
    Orthopade; 2002 Jun; 31(6):556-62. PubMed ID: 12149927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The clinical significance of vacuum mixing bone cement.
    Geiger MH; Keating EM; Ritter MA; Ginther JA; Faris PM; Meding JB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Jan; (382):258-66. PubMed ID: 11153996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional interface micromechanics of 11 en-bloc retrieved cemented femoral hip replacements.
    Mann KA; Miller MA; Verdonschot N; Izant TH; Race A
    Acta Orthop; 2010 Jun; 81(3):308-17. PubMed ID: 20367421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Failure of total hip arthroplasty with a precoated prosthesis. 4- to 11-year results.
    Dowd JE; Cha CW; Trakru S; Kim SY; Yang IH; Rubash HE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):123-36. PubMed ID: 9917597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do we need to vacuum mix or centrifuge cement?
    Wixson RL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):84-90. PubMed ID: 1446459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Vacuum mixing systems for bone cement completion - comparison of different systems].
    Horas U; Seidel P; Heiss C; Kilian O; Dingeldein E; Schnettler R
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2002; 140(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 12476381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The dynamic volume changes of polymerising polymethyl methacrylate bone cement.
    Muller SD; Green SM; McCaskie AW
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Dec; 73(6):684-7. PubMed ID: 12553519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Static shear strength between polished stem and seven commercial acrylic bone cements.
    Zhang H; Brown L; Blunt L
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2008 Feb; 19(2):591-9. PubMed ID: 17619954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does vacuum mixing affect diameter shrinkage of a PMMA cement mantle during in vitro cemented acetabulum implantation?
    Boote AT; Bigsby RJ; Deehan DJ; Rankin KS; Swailes DC; Hyde PJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Feb; 235(2):133-140. PubMed ID: 33054541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new interface element with progressive damage and osseointegration for modeling of interfaces in hip resurfacing.
    Caouette C; Bureau MN; Lavigne M; Vendittoli PA; Nuño N
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Mar; 227(3):209-20. PubMed ID: 23662336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cement-mantle thickness affects cement strains in total hip replacement.
    Fisher DA; Tsang AC; Paydar N; Milionis S; Turner CH
    J Biomech; 1997; 30(11-12):1173-7. PubMed ID: 9456387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of an expandable stem total hip replacement system.
    Kummer FJ; Strauss EJ; Jaffe WL
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2007; 65(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 17581101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extensive porosity at the cement-femoral prosthesis interface: a preliminary study.
    James SP; Schmalzried TP; McGarry FJ; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Jan; 27(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 8421001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A new method to optimize the adhesion between bone cement and acetabular bone in total hip arthroplasty].
    Wirtz DC; Lelgemann B; Jungwirth F; Niethard FU; Marx R
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12695959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.