These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10429597)

  • 21. The fixation of the cemented femoral component. Effects of stem stiffness, cement thickness and roughness of the cement-bone surface.
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Leyvraz PF
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Mar; 82(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 10755444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of surface roughness on stem-cement gaps.
    Race A; Miller MA; Ayers DC; Cleary RJ; Mann KA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2002 Nov; 84(8):1199-204. PubMed ID: 12463671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Safety, osseointegration, and bone ingrowth analysis of PMMA-based porous cement on animal metaphyseal bone defect model.
    Cimatti B; Santos MAD; Brassesco MS; Okano LT; Barboza WM; Nogueira-Barbosa MH; Engel EE
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2018 Feb; 106(2):649-658. PubMed ID: 28276202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of bone porosity on the mechanical integrity of the bone-cement interface.
    Graham J; Ries M; Pruitt L
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Oct; 85(10):1901-8. PubMed ID: 14563796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stable partial debonding of the cement interfaces indicated by a finite element model of a total hip prosthesis.
    Lu Z; Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Sarmiento A
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Mar; 14(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 8648501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nano-mechanics of bone and bioactive bone cement interfaces in a load-bearing model.
    Ni GX; Choy YS; Lu WW; Ngan AH; Chiu KY; Li ZY; Tang B; Luk KD
    Biomaterials; 2006 Mar; 27(9):1963-70. PubMed ID: 16226309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs.
    Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Mueller-Rath R; Maus U; Mumme T
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(9):2021-8. PubMed ID: 18514207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stem-cement porosity may explain early loosening of cemented femoral hip components: experimental-computational in vitro study.
    Mann KA; Damron LA; Miller MA; Race A; Clarke MT; Cleary RJ
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Mar; 25(3):340-50. PubMed ID: 17149748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of vacuum mixing and pre-heating the femoral component on the mechanical properties of the cement mantle.
    Baleani M; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Engels GE; Viceconti M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 20190321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Amphiphilic bonder improves adhesion at the acrylic bone cement-bone interface of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty: in vivo tests in an ovine model.
    Müller-Rath R; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Gravius S; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Marx R; Mumme T
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Jul; 128(7):701-7. PubMed ID: 17653560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of the shrinkage of commercial bone cements when mixed under vacuum.
    Kwong FN; Power RA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):120-2. PubMed ID: 16365134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative finite element analysis of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; Palacios J
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 38(6):2093-106. PubMed ID: 20232148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mechanical implications of interfacial defects between femoral hip implants and cement: a finite element analysis of interfacial gaps and interfacial porosity.
    Scheerlinck T; Broos J; Janssen D; Verdonschot N
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Oct; 222(7):1037-47. PubMed ID: 19024152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Borderline indications for use of cement in total joint replacements.
    Jasty M; Mulroy R; Harris WH
    Chir Organi Mov; 1992; 77(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 1297573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of femoral neck length, stem size, and body weight on strains in the proximal cement mantle.
    Harrington MA; O'Connor DO; Lozynsky AJ; Kovach I; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 11940617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of distal femoral centralizers on bone-cement in total hip arthroplasty. An experimental analysis of cement-centralizer bonding, cement void formation, and crack propagation.
    Smith SG; Kabo JM; Kilgus DJ
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Sep; 11(6):687-92. PubMed ID: 8884444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vivo behavior of acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Ries MD; Young E; Al-Marashi L; Goldstein P; Hetherington A; Petrie T; Pruitt L
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 16039712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty retrievals.
    Maloney WJ; Schmalzried T; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Dec; (405):70-8. PubMed ID: 12461358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.