141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10430116)
1. Malpractice issues in radiology. Emerging technologies.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 10430116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mala praxis: a study of malpractice claims and litigation in the field of radiology.
Irish J
Radiol Manage; 2008; 30(4):34-9; quiz 41-3. PubMed ID: 18714758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technology limitation not recognized.
Avery JK
Tenn Med; 1998 Feb; 91(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 9478122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Legal liability of the radiologist in missed breast cancer diagnosis].
Mortier M; Villeirs G
JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12693376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statute of limitations and the continuum of care doctrine.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1011-6. PubMed ID: 11641159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Lessons learned from reviewing breast imaging malpractice cases.
Arleo EK; Saleh M; Rosenblatt R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt A):1186-8. PubMed ID: 24889476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal Ramifications of Computer-Aided Detection in Mammography.
Mezrich JL; Siegel EL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jun; 12(6):572-4. PubMed ID: 25547380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the mammographic abnormality.
Brenner RJ; Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 8659365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. False-negative findings of core biopsy of the breast and malpractice issues in radiology.
Giustra PE; Leiter BE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1693-4. PubMed ID: 10350321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiological case of the month. Ductal carcinoma in situ.
DeLoach J; Hayes J; Stair M; Ludwig F; Bevans D; Fielder C; Harshfield D
J Ark Med Soc; 1996 Jan; 92(8):415-8. PubMed ID: 8582890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Extemporaneous histologic examination in infraclinical mammary lesions].
Bellocq JP; Penault-Llorca F
Bull Cancer; 2003 Apr; 90(4):299-300. PubMed ID: 12801811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When is core breast biopsy or fine-needle aspiration not enough?
Berg WA
Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):313-5. PubMed ID: 8596822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Not Available].
Rofo; 2020 Mar; 192(3):283-286. PubMed ID: 32074644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Authors' Reply.
Mezrich JL; Siegel E
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Nov; 12(11):1135-6. PubMed ID: 26541129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stereotaxic large-core biopsy after failed surgical excision.
DiPiro PJ; Meyer JE; Denison CM; Frenna TH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1192-3. PubMed ID: 8615268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. MEDICOLEGAL: Malpractice and ethical issues in radiology: reinterpreting outside mammograms prior to breast biopsy.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):W325. PubMed ID: 23436879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How to manage risk in breast screening.
Homer MJ
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1995 Jan; 17(1):25, 28-9, 73. PubMed ID: 10150422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fear of cancer.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Aug; 183(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 15269009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Radial scars diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Frequency of atypia and carcinoma on excision and implications for management.
Donaldson AR; Sieck L; Booth CN; Calhoun BC
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():201-207. PubMed ID: 27371970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: role of imaging].
Netter E; Troufléau P; Stinès J
J Radiol; 1998 Jul; 79(7):651-8. PubMed ID: 9757292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
