BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10430152)

  • 1. CT angiography with volume rendering for quantifying vascular stenoses: in vitro validation of accuracy.
    Kuszyk BS; Heath DG; Johnson PT; Eng J; Fishman EK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):449-55. PubMed ID: 10430152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods.
    Addis KA; Hopper KD; Iyriboz TA; Liu Y; Wise SW; Kasales CJ; Blebea JS; Mauger DT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1171-6. PubMed ID: 11641196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [In vitro studies to determine the degree of stenosis using spiral CT angiography].
    Wittenberg G; Lenk G; Jenett M; Elsner H; Kaiser WA; Kellner M; Schultz G; Trusen A; Hahn D
    Rofo; 1998 Jun; 168(6):557-61. PubMed ID: 9687946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring carotid artery stenosis using CT angiography: the dilemma of artifactual lumen eccentricity.
    Wise SW; Hopper KD; Ten Have T; Schwartz T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Apr; 170(4):919-23. PubMed ID: 9530034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of helical CT parameters on spatial resolution in CT angiography performed with a subsecond scanner.
    Luboldt W; Weber R; Seemann M; Desantis M; Reiser M
    Invest Radiol; 1999 Jun; 34(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 10353035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro.
    Suzuki S; Machida H; Tanaka I; Ueno E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 23436858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of helical computed tomography scan parameters for vascular imaging.
    Reynolds DM; Hazle JD; Johnston DA; Charnsangavej C
    Med Phys; 1998 Feb; 25(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 9507477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Multislice CT angiography: optimization of scan parameters in a vascular phantom].
    Funke C; Alamo L; Castillo E; Kopka L; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):927-33. PubMed ID: 11142127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm for measurement of vascular diameter on computed tomographic angiography in vitro.
    Suzuki S; Nishiyama Y; Kuwahara S; Hikosaka S; Monma K; Odagiri H
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 23493226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative digital fluorography. Computer vs. human estimation of vascular stenoses.
    Jaques P; DiBianca F; Pizer S; Kohout F; Lifshitz L; Delany D
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 3884545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [In vitro investigations for detection of vascular stenosis using spiral CT angiography].
    Beilicke M; Klöppel R; Lieberenz S
    Rofo; 1998 Mar; 168(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 9551106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Internal carotid arterial stenosis: CT angiography with volume rendering.
    Leclerc X; Godefroy O; Lucas C; Benhaim JF; Michel TS; Leys D; Pruvo JP
    Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 10207466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A phantom study: evaluation of renal artery stenosis using helical CT and 3D reconstructions.
    Davros WJ; Obuchowski NA; Berman PM; Zeman RK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(1):156-61. PubMed ID: 9022789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative evaluation of measurement accuracy for three-dimensional angiography system using various phantoms.
    Yamura M; Hirai T; Korogi Y; Ikushima I; Yamashita Y
    Radiat Med; 2005 May; 23(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 15940064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and precision of CT angiography in a model of carotid artery bifurcation stenosis.
    Dix JE; Evans AJ; Kallmes DF; Sobel AH; Phillips CD
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1997 Mar; 18(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 9090395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 256-MSCT image acquisition with sequential axial scans: evaluation of image quality and resolution in a phantom study.
    Klink T; Nagel H; Schwartz B; Regier M; Adam G; Begemann PG
    Rofo; 2012 Mar; 184(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 22290248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of vascular wall attenuation: comparison of CT angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction with standard filtered back-projection algorithm CT in vitro.
    Suzuki S; Machida H; Tanaka I; Ueno E
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3348-53. PubMed ID: 22436433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification and detectability of in-stent stenosis with CT angiography and MR angiography in arterial stents in vitro.
    Blum MB; Schmook M; Schernthaner R; Edelhauser G; Puchner S; Lammer J; Funovics MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1238-42. PubMed ID: 17954666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diameter measurement of vascular model on CT angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction: effect of tube current on accuracy.
    Suzuki S; Machida H; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Ueno E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):437-42. PubMed ID: 24450689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimization of shaded surface display for CT angiography.
    Addis KA; Hopper KD; Iyriboz TA; Kasales CJ; Liu Y; Wise SW
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Oct; 8(10):976-81. PubMed ID: 11699850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.