88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10430152)
21. Evaluating the potential and problems of three-dimensional computed tomography measurements of arterial stenosis.
Ebert DS; Heath DG; Kuszyk BS; Edwards L; Shaw CD; Kukla J; Bedwell T; Fishman EK
J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 9718505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. New techniques in CT angiography.
Lell MM; Anders K; Uder M; Klotz E; Ditt H; Vega-Higuera F; Boskamp T; Bautz WA; Tomandl BF
Radiographics; 2006 Oct; 26 Suppl 1():S45-62. PubMed ID: 17050518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Technical optimization of four-channel multidetector-row helical computed tomography for depicting arterial stenosis: a phantom study.
Takahashi S; Takamura M; Yamamoto S; Kudo M; Narumi Y; Murakami T; Nakamura H
Acta Radiol; 2007 Mar; 48(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 17354138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of automated CT angiography measurement of vascular diameter in phantoms: effect of size of display field of view, density of contrast medium, and wall thickness.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kaminaga T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1940-4. PubMed ID: 15908558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Precision and accuracy in CT attenuation measurement of vascular wall using region-of-interest supported by differentiation curve.
Suzuki S; Kidouchi T; Kuwahara S; Vembar M; Takei R; Yamamoto A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):757-61. PubMed ID: 21300506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Helical CT angiography compared with arteriography in the detection of renal artery stenosis.
Beregi JP; Elkohen M; Deklunder G; Artaud D; Coullet JM; Wattinne L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Aug; 167(2):495-501. PubMed ID: 8686635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Virtual elastic sphere processing enables reproducible quantification of vessel stenosis at CT and MR angiography.
Gremse F; Grouls C; Palmowski M; Lammers T; de Vries A; Grüll H; Das M; Mühlenbruch G; Akhtar S; Schober A; Kiessling F
Radiology; 2011 Sep; 260(3):709-17. PubMed ID: 21788527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Stenosis of the central airways: evaluation by using helical CT with multiplanar reconstructions.
Quint LE; Whyte RI; Kazerooni EA; Martinez FJ; Cascade PN; Lynch JP; Orringer MB; Brunsting LA; Deeb GM
Radiology; 1995 Mar; 194(3):871-7. PubMed ID: 7862994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography.
Dewey M; Rutsch W; Schnapauff D; Teige F; Hamm B
Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 17220725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Hyoid Bone Development: An Assessment Of Optimal CT Scanner Parameters and Three-Dimensional Volume Rendering Techniques.
Cotter MM; Whyms BJ; Kelly MP; Doherty BM; Gentry LR; Bersu ET; Vorperian HK
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2015 Aug; 298(8):1408-15. PubMed ID: 25810349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Blurring of vessels in spiral CT angiography: effects of collimation width, pitch, viewing plane, and windowing in maximum intensity projection.
Diederichs CG; Keating DP; Glatting G; Oestmann JW
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(6):965-74. PubMed ID: 8933800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Quantification of vascular stenoses using digital subtraction angiography].
Herter M; Lackner K
Rofo; 1985 Dec; 143(6):650-5. PubMed ID: 3001855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of radiation dose estimates and scan performance in pediatric high-resolution thoracic CT for volumetric 320-detector row, helical 64-detector row, and noncontiguous axial scan acquisitions.
Podberesky DJ; Angel E; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Salisbury SR; Brody AS; Alsip C; Barelli A; Egelhoff JC; Anderson-Evans C; Nguyen GB; Dow D; Frush DP
Acad Radiol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):1152-61. PubMed ID: 23931430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. 1996 AUR Memorial Award. Densitometric analysis of eccentric vascular stenoses: comparison of CO2 and iodinated contrast media.
Black CM; Lang EV; Kusnick CA; Siebes M; Barnhart W; Berbaum KS; Hoffman EA
Acad Radiol; 1996 Dec; 3(12):985-93. PubMed ID: 9017012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique.
Marcus CD; Ladam-Marcus VJ; Bigot JL; Clement C; Baehrel B; Menanteau BP
Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):775-80. PubMed ID: 10352606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Measurement of vascular diameter in vitro by automated software for CT angiography: effects of inner diameter, density of contrast medium, and convolution kernel.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kaminaga T; Yamauchi T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 May; 182(5):1313-7. PubMed ID: 15100138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. CT in vascular pathologies.
Bartolozzi C; Neri E; Caramella D
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(5):679-84. PubMed ID: 9601952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. CT angiography.
Zeman RK; Silverman PM; Vieco PT; Costello P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Nov; 165(5):1079-88. PubMed ID: 7572481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of contrast densities in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis by CT angiography.
Claves JL; Wise SW; Hopper KD; Tully D; Ten Have TR; Weaver J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):569-73. PubMed ID: 9242779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [CT angiography versus intra-arterial DSA in abdominal aortic aneurysms].
Rieker O; Düber C; Schmiedt W; Neufang A; Pitton M; Schweden F
Rofo; 1996 Jul; 165(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 8765358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
