These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10430693)
1. Rigid videosigmoidoscopy vs conventional sigmoidoscopy. A randomized controlled study. Taffinder NJ; Gould SW; Wan AC; Taylor P; Darzi A Surg Endosc; 1999 Aug; 13(8):814-6. PubMed ID: 10430693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Depth of insertion at flexible sigmoidoscopy: implications for colorectal cancer screening and instrument design. Painter J; Saunders DB; Bell GD; Williams CB; Pitt R; Bladen J Endoscopy; 1999 Mar; 31(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 10344426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of rigid vs flexible sigmoidoscopy in detection of significant anorectal lesions. Rao VS; Ahmad N; Al-Mukhtar A; Stojkovic S; Moore PJ; Ahmad SM Colorectal Dis; 2005 Jan; 7(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 15606587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short (35-cm) versus long (60-cm) flexible sigmoidoscopy: a comparison of findings and tolerance in asymptomatic patients screened for colorectal neoplasia. Dubow RA; Katon RM; Benner KG; van Dijk CM; Koval G; Smith FW Gastrointest Endosc; 1985 Oct; 31(5):305-8. PubMed ID: 4043682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sigmoidoscopy. Is it a general practice procedure? Iseli A Aust Fam Physician; 1999 Jan; 28(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 9988917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy using an upper endoscope is better tolerated by women. Farraye FA; Horton K; Hersey H; Trnka Y; Heeren T; Provenzale D Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):1074-80. PubMed ID: 15180728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitive sigmoidoscopy: a straight sigmoid technique. Long HF J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989; 2(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 2711878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Guidelines for use of the flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscope in the management of the surgical patient. Marks G; Gathright JB; Boggs HW; Ray JE; Castro AF; Salvati E Dis Colon Rectum; 1982 Apr; 25(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 7067556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fiberoptic pansigmoidoscopy. An evaluation and comparison with rigid sigmoidoscopy. Bohlman TW; Katon RM; Lipshutz GR; McCool MF; Smith FW; Melnyk CS Gastroenterology; 1977 Apr; 72(4 Pt 1):644-9. PubMed ID: 838219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flexible sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients with negative fecal occult blood tests. Cauffman JG; Hara JH; Rasgon IM; Clark VA J Fam Pract; 1992 Mar; 34(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 1541954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study of optimal length of flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopes for initial endoscopic training. Lehman GA; Hawes R; Roth B; Hast J Dis Colon Rectum; 1986 Dec; 29(12):878-81. PubMed ID: 3792171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient response to sigmoidoscopy. A randomized, controlled trial of rigid and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Winawer SJ; Miller C; Lightdale C; Herbert E; Ephram RC; Gordon L; Miller D Cancer; 1987 Oct; 60(8):1905-8. PubMed ID: 3308058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized trial comparing three methods of bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy. Osgard E; Jackson JL; Strong J Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Jul; 93(7):1126-30. PubMed ID: 9672343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]