These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10431460)

  • 1. Principal component elimination method for the improvement of S/N in evoked neuromagnetic field measurements.
    Kobayashi T; Kuriki S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Aug; 46(8):951-8. PubMed ID: 10431460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of brain noise influence in evoked neuromagnetic source localization using noise spatial correlation.
    Sekihara K; Takeuchi F; Kuriki S; Koizumi H
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Jun; 39(6):937-46. PubMed ID: 15551571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics of the background fields in multichannel-recorded magnetic field responses.
    Kuriki S; Takeuchi F; Kobayashi T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jan; 92(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 7508853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removal of magnetoencephalographic artifacts with temporal signal-space separation: demonstration with single-trial auditory-evoked responses.
    Taulu S; Hari R
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 May; 30(5):1524-34. PubMed ID: 18661502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The M100 component of evoked magnetic fields differs by scaling factors: implications for signal averaging.
    Zacharias N; Sielużycki C; Kordecki W; König R; Heil P
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1069-82. PubMed ID: 21342204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Source localization of middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields.
    Yoshiura T; Ueno S; Iramina K; Masuda K
    Brain Res; 1995 Dec; 703(1-2):139-44. PubMed ID: 8719625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Signal analysis of auditory evoked cortical fields in fetal magnetoencephalography.
    Schneider U; Schleussner E; Haueisen J; Nowak H; Seewald HJ
    Brain Topogr; 2001; 14(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 11599534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal encoding in auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields: stochastic resonance.
    Stufflebeam SM; Poeppel D; Roberts TP
    Neuroreport; 2000 Dec; 11(18):4081-5. PubMed ID: 11192632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A visual study of surface potentials and Laplacians due to distributed neocortical sources: computer simulations and evoked potentials.
    Nunez PL; Pilgreen KL; Westdorp AF; Law SK; Nelson AV
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):151-68. PubMed ID: 1793689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Latency of evoked neuromagnetic M100 reflects perceptual and acoustic stimulus attributes.
    Roberts TP; Ferrari P; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 1998 Oct; 9(14):3265-9. PubMed ID: 9831462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phase-interpolated averaging for analyzing electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography epochs.
    Matani A; Naruse Y; Terazono Y; Fujimaki N; Murata T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jan; 58(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 20889427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of covariance-based and waveform-based subtraction methods in removing the interference from button-pressing finger movements.
    Sekihara K; Poeppel D; Marantz A; Koizumi H; Miyashita Y
    Brain Topogr; 1998; 11(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 9880167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurements of auditory and somatically evoked magnetic fields and localization of their dipole sources.
    Kuriki S; Isobe Y; Mizutani Y
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1989; 1(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 2486751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A general framework for extracting fetal magnetoencephalogram and audio-evoked responses.
    Razavipour F; Sameni R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Jan; 212(2):283-96. PubMed ID: 23164961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
    Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.
    Salajegheh A; Link A; Elster C; Burghoff M; Sander T; Trahms L; Poeppel D
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting and correcting for head movements in neuromagnetic measurements.
    Uutela K; Taulu S; Hämäläinen M
    Neuroimage; 2001 Dec; 14(6):1424-31. PubMed ID: 11707098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal magnetoencephalography: current progress and trends.
    Preissl H; Lowery CL; Eswaran H
    Exp Neurol; 2004 Nov; 190 Suppl 1():S28-36. PubMed ID: 15498539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency.
    Roberts TP; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 1996 Apr; 7(6):1138-40. PubMed ID: 8817518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.