247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10431491)
21. Identification of measurement differences between English and Spanish language versions of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Detecting differential item functioning using MIMIC modeling.
Jones RN
Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S124-33. PubMed ID: 17060819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A combined-method psychometric analysis recommended modification of the multidimensional health locus of control scales.
Kelly PA; Kallen MA; Suárez-Almazor ME
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 May; 60(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 17419954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
Revuelta J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fitting Rasch model using appropriateness measure statistics.
López Pina JA; Hidalgo Montesinos MD
Span J Psychol; 2005 May; 8(1):100-10. PubMed ID: 15875462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model.
Smith RM; Schumacker RE; Bush MJ
J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 9661732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A longitudinal evaluation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D) in a rheumatoid arthritis population using Rasch analysis.
Covic T; Pallant JF; Conaghan PG; Tennant A
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2007 Jul; 5():41. PubMed ID: 17629902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. DIF Cancellation in the Rasch Model.
Wyse AE
J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 23816591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparability of item quality indices from sparse data matrices with random and non-random missing data patterns.
Wolfe EW; McGill MT
J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 22357157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: an evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis.
Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Hassell JB; Keeffe JE
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 47(11):4732-41. PubMed ID: 17065481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An international scoring system for self-reported health complaints in adolescents.
Ravens-Sieberer U; Erhart M; Torsheim T; Hetland J; Freeman J; Danielson M; Thomas C;
Eur J Public Health; 2008 Jun; 18(3):294-9. PubMed ID: 18252752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pseudolikelihood estimation of the Rasch model.
Smit A; Kelderman H
J Outcome Meas; 2000; 4(1):513-23. PubMed ID: 11272599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Internal construct validity of the Oxford Knee Scale: evidence from Rasch measurement.
Conaghan PG; Emerton M; Tennant A
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Dec; 57(8):1363-7. PubMed ID: 18050174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A simulation study provided sample size guidance for differential item functioning (DIF) studies using short scales.
Scott NW; Fayers PM; Aaronson NK; Bottomley A; de Graeff A; Groenvold M; Gundy C; Koller M; Petersen MA; Sprangers MA; ;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 18774693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Goodness of fit in polytomous items: Type I error rates and empirical power for three fit-indexes].
Sueiro MJ; Abad FJ
Psicothema; 2009 Nov; 21(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 19861112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example.
Hagquist C; Bruce M; Gustavsson JP
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):380-93. PubMed ID: 19059593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The recovery of the density scale using a stochastic quasi-realization of additive conjoint measurement.
Pelton TW; Bunderson CV
J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 12904677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Local independence and residual covariance: a study of olympic figure skating ratings.
Linacre JM
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(2):157-69. PubMed ID: 19564696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of multilevel logistic regression to identify the causes of differential item functioning.
Balluerka N; Gorostiaga A; Gómez-Benito J; Hidalgo MD
Psicothema; 2010 Nov; 22(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 21044547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Differential item functioning (DIF) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Overview, sample, and issues of translation.
Ramirez M; Teresi JA; Holmes D; Gurland B; Lantigua R
Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S95-S106. PubMed ID: 17060840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
