BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10431531)

  • 1. [Stark's method of cesarean section. Advantages compared to the traditional method].
    Corosu R; Roma B; Vizzaccaro F; Franchi M
    Minerva Ginecol; 1999 May; 51(5):203-5. PubMed ID: 10431531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Innovations of the Stark method for cesarean section. Comparison of techniques].
    Grignaffini A; Bazzani F; Rinaldi M; Azzoni D; Vadora E
    Minerva Ginecol; 1999 Dec; 51(12):475-82. PubMed ID: 10767996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Modifications to the technic of cesarean section after Stark].
    Corosu R; Roma B; Marziali M; Di Roberto R
    Minerva Ginecol; 1998 Sep; 50(9):391-5. PubMed ID: 9842209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Misgav Ladach method: a step forward in the operative technique of caesarean section.
    Poonam ; Banerjee B; Singh SN; Raina A
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2006; 4(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 18603898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between the use of the Joel-Cohen incision and its modification during Stark's cesarean section.
    Malvasi A; Tinelli A; Serio G; Tinelli R; Casciaro S; Cavallotti C
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Oct; 20(10):757-61. PubMed ID: 17763278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Caesarean section: closure or non-closure of peritoneum? A randomized trial of postoperative morbidity].
    Huchon C; Raiffort C; Chis C; Messaoudi F; Jacquemot MC; Panel P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Oct; 33(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 16154376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at caesarean section.
    van Bogaert LJ; Misra A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Apr; 29(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 19358028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of the ''Misgav Ladach'' and traditional Pfannenstiel surgical techniques for cesarean section.
    Belci D; Kos M; Zoricić D; Kuharić L; Slivar A; Begić-Razem E; Grdinić I
    Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Jun; 59(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 17576402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical observation of Stark cesarean section as secondary abdominal surgery].
    Ma YY; Zhu XL; Dong Y; Wang YQ; Zheng ZM; Zhang RJ; Xu Y; Zhao JJ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 40(11):729-31. PubMed ID: 16324243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised controlled study of non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section in a Nigerian population.
    Malomo OO; Kuti O; Orji EO; Ogunniyi SO; Sule SS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jul; 26(5):429-32. PubMed ID: 16846869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The "gentle caesarean section" - an alternative to the classical way of sectio. A prospective comparison between the classical technique and the method of Misgav Ladach].
    Redlich A; Köppe I
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Nov; 123(11):638-43. PubMed ID: 11797162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modified Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: clinical experience.
    Kulas T; Habek D; Karsa M; Bobić-Vuković M
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2008; 65(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 18196903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review of advantages of Joel-Cohen surgical abdominal incision in caesarean section: a basic science perspective.
    Karanth KL; Sathish N
    Med J Malaysia; 2010 Sep; 65(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 21939169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post-operative complications after caesarean section in HIV-infected women.
    Ferrero S; Bentivoglio G
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2003 Oct; 268(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 14504867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incidence of post-operative adhesions following Misgav Ladach caesarean section--a comparative study.
    Fatusić Z; Hudić I
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Feb; 22(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 19253164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Advantages and hazards of preventing infection following cesarean section--clinical and bacteriologic results of a high-dosage treatment with mezlocillin and oxacillin short-term preventive following clamping of the umbilical cord].
    Engel K; Amir-Moazami B; Karschnia R; Hahn T
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1984 Mar; 44(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 6373481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Routine cervical dilatation during elective cesarean section and its influence on maternal morbidity: a randomized controlled study.
    Ahmed B; Abu Nahia F; Abushama M
    J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(6):510-3. PubMed ID: 16318613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Female reproductive function and immune status after M. Stark's modified cesarean section].
    Gabaidze TA; Kherodinashvili ShSh; Lezhava ND; Iashvili TI; Oniashvili NN
    Georgian Med News; 2006 Oct; (139):81-4. PubMed ID: 17077477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-term postnatal quality of life in women with previous Misgav Ladach caesarean section compared to Pfannenstiel-Dorffler caesarean section method.
    Fatušić Z; Hudić I; Sinanović O; Kapidžić M; Hotić N; Musić A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1138-42. PubMed ID: 21231844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study.
    Zareian Z; Zareian P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006; 128(1-2):267-9. PubMed ID: 16716491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.