BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10432127)

  • 1. Colposcopy in pregnancy: directed brush cytology compared with cervical biopsy.
    Lieberman RW; Henry MR; Laskin WB; Walenga J; Buckner SB; O'Connor DM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Aug; 94(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 10432127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can we substitute brush cytology for biopsy in the evaluation of cervical lesions under the guidance of colposcopy?
    Eftekhar Z; Izadi-Mood N; Yarandi F; Khodamoradi M; Rahimi-Moghaddam P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(3):489-92. PubMed ID: 15882174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
    Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colposcopic management of abnormal cervical cytology during pregnancy.
    Tunca JC; Franklin EW; Clark JC
    South Med J; 1976 Jun; 69(6):705-7. PubMed ID: 935898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of colposcopically directed, four-quadrant cervical biopsy by the colposcopy trainee.
    Homesley HD; Jobson VW; Reish RL
    J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 6726700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the accuracy of colposcopy at predicting the outcome of abnormal cytology in pregnancy.
    Siddiq TS; Twigg JP; Hammond RH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jan; 124(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 16029922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Colposcopy, cervicography, speculoscopy and endoscopy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    van Niekerk WA; Dunton CJ; Richart RM; Hilgarth M; Kato H; Kaufman RH; Mango LJ; Nozawa S; Robinowitz M
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 9479322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of cervical cytology in HIV-infected women.
    Del Priore G; Maag T; Bhattacharya M; Garcia PM; Till M; Lurain JR
    Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Mar; 56(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 7705674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Significance of atypical cervical cytology in pregnancy.
    Kaminski PF; Lyon DS; Sorosky JI; Wheelock JB; Podczaski ES
    Am J Perinatol; 1992; 9(5-6):340-3. PubMed ID: 1418129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a cervical cytology device (cell-sweep) based on comparison to colposcopic findings.
    Kieswetter C; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller PB
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2001 Nov; 93(11):436-9. PubMed ID: 11730116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of using electrical impedance spectroscopy (ZedScan) on the performance of colposcopy in diagnosing high grade squamous lesions of the cervix.
    Muszynski C; Dupont E; Vaysse B; Lanta S; Tidy J; Sergent F; Gondry J
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 46(9):669-673. PubMed ID: 28866125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Cinel A; Oselladore M; Insacco E; Minucci D
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1990; 11(6):433-7. PubMed ID: 1964902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How long is too long? Application of acetic acid during colposcopy: a prospective study.
    Hilal Z; Tempfer CB; Burgard L; Rehman S; Rezniczek GA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jul; 223(1):101.e1-101.e8. PubMed ID: 31981505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cervical microinvasive squamous carcinoma during pregnancy: observation and outcome of pregnancy with planned delayed treatment].
    Wang T; Wu YM; Song F; Zhu L; Hao X; Kong WM; Duan W; Fan L; Zhang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 47(12):888-92. PubMed ID: 23324186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Value of 4-quadrant biopsies under colposcopy for detecting precancerous lesions in cervical cancer screening].
    Zhao Y; Song Y; Zhao F; Zhang W; Li L; Chen F; Chen W; Pan Q; Shen G; Qiao Y
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Nov; 37(11):875-9. PubMed ID: 26887523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Colposcopic evaluation of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Benedet JL; Boyes DA; Nichols TM; Millner A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1976 Mar; 83(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 1252383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in patients with suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix.
    Kirkup W; Hill AS
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Jan; 87(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7362782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Colposcopic evaluation of the abnormal Papanicolaou test in pregnancy.
    DePetrillo AD; Townsend DE; Morrow CP; Lickrish GM; DiSaia PJ; Roy M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Feb; 121(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 1146871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.