211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10432586)
1. Effectiveness of cleaning techniques used in the food industry in terms of the removal of bacterial biofilms.
Gibson H; Taylor JH; Hall KE; Holah JT
J Appl Microbiol; 1999 Jul; 87(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 10432586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) channel model of cyclic-buildup biofilm and traditional biofilm: The impact of friction, and detergent on cleaning and subsequent high-level disinfection.
Ribeiro MM; Graziano KU; Olson N; França R; Alfa MJ
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 41(2):172-180. PubMed ID: 31685050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of current disinfection procedures against biofilm on contaminated GI endoscopes.
Neves MS; da Silva MG; Ventura GM; Côrtes PB; Duarte RS; de Souza HS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 May; 83(5):944-53. PubMed ID: 26408426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of a warming device on contact lens case contamination.
Willcox MD; Zhu H; Vijay AK
Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Nov; 38(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 22868901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The synergistic effect of enzymatic detergents on biofilm cleaning from different surfaces.
Tsiaprazi-Stamou A; Monfort IY; Romani AM; Bakalis S; Gkatzionis K
Biofouling; 2019 Sep; 35(8):883-899. PubMed ID: 31663364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of pediatric tracheostomy tube cleaning.
Silva RC; Ojano-Dirain CP; Antonelli PJ
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Mar; 138(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 22351853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contact lens storage case hygiene practice and storage case contamination.
Vijay AK; Willcox M; Zhu H; Stapleton F
Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Mar; 41(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 25230082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of cleaning regimens in silver-impregnated and hydrogen peroxide lens cases.
Wu YT; Zhu H; Willcox M; Stapleton F
Eye Contact Lens; 2011 Nov; 37(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 21983551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disinfection of rigid nasal endoscopes following in vitro contamination with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae.
Bradford BD; Seiberling KA; Park FE; Hiebert JC; Chang DF
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jun; 139(6):574-8. PubMed ID: 23680971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biofilm contamination of high-touched surfaces in intensive care units: epidemiology and potential impacts.
Costa DM; Johani K; Melo DS; Lopes LKO; Lopes Lima LKO; Tipple AFV; Hu H; Vickery K
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2019 Apr; 68(4):269-276. PubMed ID: 30758060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microbiological and chemical analyses of stainless steel and ceramics subjected to repeated soiling and cleaning treatments.
Verran J; Boyd RD; Hall K; West RH
J Food Prot; 2001 Sep; 64(9):1377-87. PubMed ID: 11563515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of multiple cycles of contamination, detergent washing, and disinfection on the development of biofilm in endoscope tubing.
Vickery K; Ngo QD; Zou J; Cossart YE
Am J Infect Control; 2009 Aug; 37(6):470-5. PubMed ID: 19155094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A model system for evaluating surface disinfection in dairy factory environments.
Knight GC; Craven HM
Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Feb; 137(2-3):161-7. PubMed ID: 20022125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of disinfectants cleaning against bacterial biofilm of house hold water tanks.
Aljubair AH; Maaroufi A; Hadj Ali MS
Arch Inst Pasteur Tunis; 2007; 84(1-4):77-88. PubMed ID: 19388587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antimicrobial activity and effectiveness of a combination of sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide in killing and removing Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms from surfaces.
DeQueiroz GA; Day DF
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 103(4):794-802. PubMed ID: 17897181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Artificial dry surface biofilm models for testing the efficacy of cleaning and disinfection.
Ledwoch K; Said J; Norville P; Maillard JY
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2019 Apr; 68(4):329-336. PubMed ID: 30802983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of cleaning and disinfection agents on biofilm structure and on microbial transfer to a solid model food.
Midelet G; Carpentier B
J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 97(2):262-70. PubMed ID: 15239692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of methods for counting surviving biofilm cells adhering to a polyvinyl chloride surface exposed to chlorine or drying.
Asséré A; Oulahal N; Carpentier B
J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 104(6):1692-702. PubMed ID: 18217936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of enzymatic cleaning agents and disinfectants against bacterial biofilms.
Augustin M; Ali-Vehmas T; Atroshi F
J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2004 Feb; 7(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 15144735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enzymes Enhance Biofilm Removal Efficiency of Cleaners.
Stiefel P; Mauerhofer S; Schneider J; Maniura-Weber K; Rosenberg U; Ren Q
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2016 Jun; 60(6):3647-52. PubMed ID: 27044552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
