BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10434213)

  • 1. Advanced pulse oximeter signal processing technology compared to simple averaging. I. Effect on frequency of alarms in the operating room.
    Rheineck-Leyssius AT; Kalkman CJ
    J Clin Anesth; 1999 May; 11(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 10434213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advanced pulse oximeter signal processing technology compared to simple averaging. II. Effect on frequency of alarms in the postanesthesia care unit.
    Rheineck-Leyssius AT; Kalkman CJ
    J Clin Anesth; 1999 May; 11(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 10434214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of pulse oximeter settings on the frequency of alarms and detection of hypoxemia: Theoretical effects of artifact rejection, alarm delay, averaging, median filtering or a lower setting of the alarm limit.
    Rheineck-Leyssius AT; Kalkman CJ
    J Clin Monit Comput; 1998 Apr; 14(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 9676861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuous pulse oximetry in the general surgical ward: Nellcor N-200 versus Nellcor N-3000.
    Christensen M; Lie C; Rosenberg J
    Anaesthesia; 1999 Mar; 54(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 10364861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of conventional and new pulse oximetry in neonatal patients.
    Hay WW; Rodden DJ; Collins SM; Melara DL; Hale KA; Fashaw LM
    J Perinatol; 2002; 22(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 12082469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in pulse oximetry technology can affect detection of sleep-disorderd breathing in children.
    Brouillette RT; Lavergne J; Leimanis A; Nixon GM; Ladan S; McGregor CD
    Anesth Analg; 2002 Jan; 94(1 Suppl):S47-53. PubMed ID: 11900039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimizing interference and false alarms from electrocautery in the Nellcor N-100 pulse oximeter.
    Block FE; Detko GJ
    J Clin Monit; 1986 Jul; 2(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 3746371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postanesthesia monitoring revisited: frequency of true and false alarms from different monitoring devices.
    Wiklund L; Hök B; Ståhl K; Jordeby-Jönsson A
    J Clin Anesth; 1994; 6(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 8060626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved Filtering of Pulse Oximeter Monitoring Alarms in the Neonatal ICU: Bedside Significance.
    Stefanescu BM; O'Shea TM; Haury F; Carlo WA; Slaughter JC
    Respir Care; 2016 Jan; 61(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 26508772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pulse oximeters' reliability in detecting hypoxemia and bradycardia: comparison between a conventional and two new generation oximeters.
    Bohnhorst B; Peter CS; Poets CF
    Crit Care Med; 2000 May; 28(5):1565-8. PubMed ID: 10834712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of a prototype motion artifact resistant pulse oximeter in the recovery room.
    Dumas C; Wahr JA; Tremper KK
    Anesth Analg; 1996 Aug; 83(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 8694304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoperative pulse oximetry: frequency and distribution of discrepant data.
    Pan PH; Gravenstein N
    J Clin Anesth; 1994; 6(6):491-5. PubMed ID: 7880513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of motion on the performance of pulse oximeters in volunteers (revised publication).
    Barker SJ; Shah NK
    Anesthesiology; 1997 Jan; 86(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 9009945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between pulse oximetry and transthoracic impedance alarm traces during home monitoring.
    Nassi N; Piumelli R; Lombardi E; Landini L; Donzelli G; de Martino M
    Arch Dis Child; 2008 Feb; 93(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 17893118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical use of new-generation pulse oximeters in the neonatal intensive care unit.
    Workie FA; Rais-Bahrami K; Short BL
    Am J Perinatol; 2005 Oct; 22(7):357-60. PubMed ID: 16215921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. False alarm rates of three third-generation pulse oximeters in PACU, ICU and IABP patients.
    Lutter NO; Urankar S; Kroeber S
    Anesth Analg; 2002 Jan; 94(1 Suppl):S69-75. PubMed ID: 11900042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of motion on the performance of pulse oximeters in volunteers.
    Barker SJ; Shah NK
    Anesthesiology; 1996 Oct; 85(4):774-81. PubMed ID: 8873547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective comparison of 3 new-generation pulse oximetry devices during ambulation after open heart surgery.
    Richards NM; Giuliano KK; Jones PG
    Respir Care; 2006 Jan; 51(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 16381614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of a prototype esophageal oximetry probe with two conventional digital pulse oximetry monitors in aortocoronary bypass patients.
    Prielipp RC; Scuderi PE; Hines MH; Atlee JL; Butterworth JF
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2000; 16(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 12578104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. False alarms and sensitivity of conventional pulse oximetry versus the Masimo SET technology in the pediatric postanesthesia care unit.
    Malviya S; Reynolds PI; Voepel-Lewis T; Siewert M; Watson D; Tait AR; Tremper K
    Anesth Analg; 2000 Jun; 90(6):1336-40. PubMed ID: 10825316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.