72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10434914)
1. Design of a PC controlled test device for the study of patient motion in X-ray radiology: first applications and results.
Guibelalde E; Vañó E; Fernández JM; Molinero A; Alberdi J; Merillas A
Br J Radiol; 1998 Nov; 71(851):1185-91. PubMed ID: 10434914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
Busch HP
Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.
McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Vrtiska TJ; King BF; LeRoy AJ; Quam JP; Hattery RR
Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 11687682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Preliminary clinical applications of asymmetric screen-film systems in chest radiography].
Higashida Y; Katsuda N; Tochihara S; Yoshioka S; Bussaka H; Tomiguchi S; Takada T; Matsumoto M; Takahashi M; Yoshida A
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Feb; 54(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 8121782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laser alignment system for high-quality portable radiography.
MacMahon H; Yasillo NJ; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1992 Jan; 12(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 1734456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Photostimulation plates or conventional films for bedside chest x-ray in pediatric radiology? A comparative study of quality of image and the dose delivered to patients].
Maccia C; Docou le Pointe H; Fery-Lemonnier E; Nadeau X; Montagne JP; Charpentier E; Ariche-Cohen M; Viens-Bitker C
J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 77(11):1129-34. PubMed ID: 9033870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Digital thorax radiography: flat-panel detector or storage phosphor plates].
Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Sailer J; Kabalan N; Herold C; Prokop M
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):351-61. PubMed ID: 12764583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effects of high-strip density anti-scatter grid on image quality and radiation dose].
Wamser G; Maier W; Aichinger H; Bohndorf K
Rofo; 1997 Jun; 166(6):475-80. PubMed ID: 9272997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environment.
Andriole KP; Luth DM; Gould RG
J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():124-6. PubMed ID: 12105711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Radiological study of the thorax. Evaluation of efficacy-efficiency of a large-field image intensifier in mass screening].
Bonetti MG; Gregori S; Lamarche V; Radice E; Spiga G; Maggi S; Giorgini P; Giovagnoni A; De Nigris E; Amici F
Radiol Med; 1989 Sep; 78(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 2798965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
Andriole KP
J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
