These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10434914)

  • 21. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparison of standard and asymmetric screen-film systems in thoracic radiography].
    Levitska G; Popsavov P; Buchakliev Z; Rizov A; Baburov S; Ivanova K; Pomakov P
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1996; (6):35-7. PubMed ID: 9027078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The use of dynamic phantoms in interventional radiology.
    Guibelade E; Vañó E; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K; Fernández JM; Ten JI; Rawlings DJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):155-9. PubMed ID: 11487827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
    Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Comparative findings of digital thoracic images and digital images of statistical phantoms as film copy, a radiological work station and a PC].
    Ricke J; Wolf M; Zielinski C; Hosten N; Liebig T; Amthauer H; Hänninen EL; Schumacher T; Stroszczynski C; Bergh B; Emmel D; Schauer W
    Rofo; 1998 Mar; 168(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 9551113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new high-definition microfocal X-ray unit.
    Buckland-Wright JC
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Mar; 62(735):201-8. PubMed ID: 2702377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Memory artifact related to selenium-based digital radiography systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):881-3. PubMed ID: 9169721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [New computed radiography technologies in digital radiography].
    Fasbender R; Schaetzing R
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 12764585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
    Roversi R; Castaldini L; Guidarelli G
    Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Results of a nationwide survey of chest radiography: comparison with results of a previous study.
    Kaczmarek RV; Conway BJ; Slayton RO; Suleiman OH
    Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):891-6. PubMed ID: 10831717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Bedside thoracic radiography: a comparison between 3 different types of grid].
    Ciccotosto C; Storto ML; Guidotti A; Ferrante R; Bonomo L
    Radiol Med; 1994; 87(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 8128015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
    Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The value of the InSight HC asymmetric film-screen system in thoracic diagnosis].
    Häussler MD; Lenzen H; Reckels C; Peters PE
    Rofo; 1994 Mar; 160(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 8136481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Technical aspects of screen-film radiography, film processing, and quality control.
    Gray JE
    Radiographics; 1997; 17(1):177-87. PubMed ID: 9017807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Halo suppression in full-field x-ray Zernike phase contrast microscopy.
    Vartiainen I; Mokso R; Stampanoni M; David C
    Opt Lett; 2014 Mar; 39(6):1601-4. PubMed ID: 24690848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
    Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
    Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of resolution and sensitometric characteristics of an asymmetric screen-film imaging system.
    Gray JE; Stears JG; Swensen SJ; Bunch PC
    Radiology; 1993 Aug; 188(2):537-9. PubMed ID: 8327711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.