105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10434915)
1. An investigation of X-ray equipment factors influencing patient dose in radiography.
Williams JR; Catling MK
Br J Radiol; 1998 Nov; 71(851):1192-8. PubMed ID: 10434915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study and optimization of lumbar spine X-ray imaging systems.
McVey G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Br J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 76(903):177-88. PubMed ID: 12684233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Entrance doses during lateral lumbar spine and antero-posterior abdomen examinations: generator waveform dependence.
Morrison GD; Underwood AC
Br J Radiol; 1995 May; 68(809):491-4. PubMed ID: 7788234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of computed radiography and film/screen combination using a contrast-detail phantom.
Lu ZF; Nickoloff EL; So JC; Dutta AK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 12540823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of carbon fibre material in radiographic cassettes: estimation of the dose and contrast advantages.
Dance DR; Lester SA; Carlsson GA; Sandborg M; Persliden J
Br J Radiol; 1997 Apr; 70(832):383-90. PubMed ID: 9166075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of breast shielding outside the field of view on breast entrance surface dose in axial X-ray examinations: a phantom study.
Hurley L; Alashban Y; Albeshan S; England A; McEntee MF
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 May; 29(3):555-560. PubMed ID: 37129301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality and dose in lumbar spine examinations: results of a 5 year quality control programme following the European quality criteria trial.
Vañó E; Oliete S; González L; Guibelalde E; Velasco A; Fernández JM
Br J Radiol; 1995 Dec; 68(816):1332-35. PubMed ID: 8777594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A study of dose reduction using digital luminescence radiography for lateral skull radiography.
Seifert H; Kubale R; Hagen T; Kramann B; Leetz HK
Br J Radiol; 1996 Apr; 69(820):311-7. PubMed ID: 8665130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reference dose levels for patients undergoing common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Irish hospitals.
Johnston DA; Brennan PC
Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):396-402. PubMed ID: 10844865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
Huda W
Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria.
Almén A; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Besjakov J; Kheddache S; Lanhede B; Månsson LG; Zankl M
Br J Radiol; 2000 Nov; 73(875):1192-9. PubMed ID: 11144797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lowering patient dose on single-phase X-ray units.
Fung K
Radiol Technol; 1995; 66(3):159-64; quiz 165-6. PubMed ID: 7708914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Filter materials for dose reduction in screen-film radiography.
Koedooder K; Venema HW
Phys Med Biol; 1986 Jun; 31(6):585-600. PubMed ID: 3755830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the use of additional X-ray beam filtration during cine acquisition reduce clinical image quality and effective dose in cardiac interventional imaging?
Davies AG; Gislason-Lee AJ; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Lupton M; Moore J; Sivananthan M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Dec; 162(4):597-604. PubMed ID: 24563525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of a new radiographic technique utilizing a concave table.
Kishigami Y; Yoshizaki A; Saito D; Seo H
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2000; 41(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 10695874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design of a database with graphical analysis for X-ray quality assurance and dose information to assist in a programme for patient dose reduction.
Lam C; Martin CJ
Br J Radiol; 1991 Sep; 64(765):831-5. PubMed ID: 1913047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regional survey of entrance surface dose to patients from X-ray examinations in Saudi Arabia.
Saeed MK
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Jun; 38(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 25801149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Herz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 18033949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimisation of patient radiation protection in conventional X-ray imaging procedures using film reject analysis: a demonstration of the importance of rare earth screen-film systems.
Inkoom S; Schandorf C; Fletcher JJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Sep; 136(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 19737839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molybdenum/aluminum filters perform effectively.
Burns CB; Renner JB
Radiol Technol; 1993; 64(4):216-9. PubMed ID: 8464998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
