273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10435524)
41. Monte Carlo dose calculations in homogeneous media and at interfaces: a comparison between GEPTS, EGSnrc, MCNP, and measurements.
Chibani O; Li XA
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):835-47. PubMed ID: 12033580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A new concept of pencil beam dose calculation for 40-200 keV photons using analytical dose kernels.
Bartzsch S; Oelfke U
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111714. PubMed ID: 24320422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Build-up and surface dose measurements on phantoms using micro-MOSFET in 6 and 10 MV x-ray beams and comparisons with Monte Carlo calculations.
Xiang HF; Song JS; Chin DW; Cormack RA; Tishler RB; Makrigiorgos GM; Court LE; Chin LM
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1266-73. PubMed ID: 17500458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Calculation of the dose in the build-up region for high energy photon beam. Treatment planning when beam spoilers are employed.
McKenna MG; Chen XG; Altschuler MD; Bloch P
Radiother Oncol; 1995 Jan; 34(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 7792400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Generalized eMC implementation for Monte Carlo dose calculation of electron beams from different machine types.
Fix MK; Cygler J; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Manser P
Phys Med Biol; 2013 May; 58(9):2841-59. PubMed ID: 23563175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Monte Carlo linear accelerator simulation of megavoltage photon beams: independent determination of initial beam parameters.
Almberg SS; Frengen J; Kylling A; Lindmo T
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 22225273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Photon dose calculation of a three-dimensional treatment planning system compared to the Monte Carlo code BEAM.
Francescon P; Cavedon C; Reccanello S; Cora S
Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1579-87. PubMed ID: 10947261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The response of a radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter in megavoltage photon and electron beams.
Araki F; Ohno T
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):122102. PubMed ID: 25471975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Monte Carlo characterization of skin doses in 6 MV transverse field MRI-linac systems: effect of field size, surface orientation, magnetic field strength, and exit bolus.
Oborn BM; Metcalfe PE; Butson MJ; Rosenfeld AB
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5208-17. PubMed ID: 21089754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo treatment planning system.
Ma CM; Mok E; Kapur A; Pawlicki T; Findley D; Brain S; Forster K; Boyer AL
Med Phys; 1999 Oct; 26(10):2133-43. PubMed ID: 10535630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Determining the incident electron fluence for Monte Carlo-based photon treatment planning using a standard measured data set.
Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Libby B; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 12722809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Magnetic fields with photon beams: Monte Carlo calculations for a model magnetic field.
Jette D
Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2726-38. PubMed ID: 11190956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Radiation transport calculations for 50 MV photon therapy beam using the Monte Carlo code GEANT4.
Larsson S; Svensson R; Gudowska I; Ivanchenko V; Brahme A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):503-7. PubMed ID: 16381775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Secondary electron fluence perturbation by high-Z interfaces in clinical proton beams: a Monte Carlo study.
Verhaegen F; Palmans H
Phys Med Biol; 1999 Jan; 44(1):167-83. PubMed ID: 10071882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of inhomogeneity correction algorithms in small photon fields.
Jones AO; Das IJ
Med Phys; 2005 Mar; 32(3):766-76. PubMed ID: 15839349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.
Van Esch A; Tillikainen L; Pyykkonen J; Tenhunen M; Helminen H; Siljamäki S; Alakuijala J; Paiusco M; Lori M; Huyskens DP
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Combining tissue-phantom ratios to provide a beam-quality specifier for flattening filter free photon beams.
Dalaryd M; Knöös T; Ceberg C
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111716. PubMed ID: 25370630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Magnetic collimation and metal foil filtering for electron range and fluence modulation.
Phaisangittisakul N; D'Souza WD; Ma L
Med Phys; 2004 Jan; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 14761016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A systematic evaluation of air cavity dose perturbation in megavoltage x-ray beams.
Li XA; Yu C; Holmes T
Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):1011-7. PubMed ID: 10841404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
