These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10435532)

  • 41. Mammograms obtained with rhodium vs molybdenum anodes: contrast and dose differences.
    Kimme-Smith C; Wang J; DeBruhl N; Basic M; Bassett LW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1313-7. PubMed ID: 8191989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Progress in mammography technics. Bimetal anode tubes and selective filtration technic].
    Küchler M; Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8334265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Transmission of broad W/Rh and W/Al (target/filter) x-ray beams operated at 25-49 kVp through common shielding materials.
    Li X; Zhang D; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4132-8. PubMed ID: 22830746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Solid-state dosimeters: a new approach for mammography measurements.
    Brateman LF; Heintz PH
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):542-57. PubMed ID: 25652475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dynamic range requirements in digital mammography.
    Maidment AD; Fahrig R; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(6):1621-33. PubMed ID: 8309434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Beam collimation with polycapillary x-ray optics for high contrast high resolution monochromatic imaging.
    Sugiro FR; Li D; MacDonald CA
    Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3288-97. PubMed ID: 15651611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. X-ray spectra estimation using attenuation measurements from 25 kVp to 18 MV.
    Waggener RG; Blough MM; Terry JA; Chen D; Lee NE; Zhang S; McDavid WD
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1269-78. PubMed ID: 10435529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contrast-to-noise ratios of different elements in digital mammography: evaluation of their potential as new contrast agents.
    Diekmann F; Sommer A; Lawaczeck R; Diekmann S; Pietsch H; Speck U; Hamm B; Bick U
    Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 17414528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Microdosimetric characterisation of 28 kVp Mo/Mo, Rh/Rh, Rh/Al, W/Rh and Mo/Rh mammography X ray spectra.
    Verhaegen F; Castellano IA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 99(1-4):393-6. PubMed ID: 12194338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Scatter/primary ratios for x-ray spectra modified to enhance iodine contrast in screen-film mammography.
    Fritz SL; Chang CH; Livingston WH
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(6):866-70. PubMed ID: 6656696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Jesneck JL; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):588-99. PubMed ID: 15789606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography: dependence on anode material, breast thickness, and lesion type.
    Fahrig R; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1994 Sep; 21(9):1473-81. PubMed ID: 7838059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in mammography.
    Ng KP; Kwok CS; Tang FH
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 May; 45(5):1309-18. PubMed ID: 10843106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Studies on image quality in mammography using a tungsten anode tube in conjunction with edge filters].
    Minski M; Säbel M; Aichinger H; Joite-Barfuss S
    Rofo; 1988 Apr; 148(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 2834793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Exploitation possibilities of characteristic autoradiations for dermatological radiotherapy].
    Schirren JM
    Strahlentherapie; 1975 Aug; 150(2):162-83. PubMed ID: 1179447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A K edge filter technique for optimization of the coherent-to-Compton scatter ratio method.
    Harding G; Armstrong R; McDaid S; Cooper MJ
    Med Phys; 1995 Dec; 22(12):2007-14. PubMed ID: 8746705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. X-ray forward-scatter imaging: experimental validation of model.
    Leclair RJ; Johns PC
    Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):210-9. PubMed ID: 11243346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Enhanced risk from low-energy screen--film mammography X rays.
    Brenner DJ; Amols HI
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Oct; 62(742):910-4. PubMed ID: 2819359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Film and xeroradiographic images in mammography. A comparison of tungsten and molybdenum anode materials.
    Evans AL; James WB; McLellan J; Davison M
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Dec; 48(576):968-72. PubMed ID: 1218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of tungsten and molybdenum as target material for mammographic x-ray tubes.
    Rini JM; Horowitz A; Balter S; Watson RC
    Radiology; 1973 Mar; 106(3):657-61. PubMed ID: 4684810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.