155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10436109)
1. Improved automated detection of embolic signals using a novel frequency filtering approach.
Markus H; Cullinane M; Reid G
Stroke; 1999 Aug; 30(8):1610-5. PubMed ID: 10436109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency filtering improves ultrasonic embolic signal detection.
Markus HS; Reid G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Jun; 25(5):857-60. PubMed ID: 10414903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of new online automated embolic signal detection algorithm, including comparison with panel of international experts.
Cullinane M; Reid G; Dittrich R; Kaposzta Z; Ackerstaff R; Babikian V; Droste DW; Grossett D; Siebler M; Valton L; Markus HS
Stroke; 2000 Jun; 31(6):1335-41. PubMed ID: 10835453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How good is intercenter agreement in the identification of embolic signals in carotid artery disease?
Markus H; Bland JM; Rose G; Sitzer M; Siebler M
Stroke; 1996 Jul; 27(7):1249-52. PubMed ID: 8685937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized detection of cerebral emboli and discrimination from artifact using Doppler ultrasound.
Markus H; Loh A; Brown MM
Stroke; 1993 Nov; 24(11):1667-72. PubMed ID: 8236340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multigated Doppler ultrasound in the detection of emboli in a flow model and embolic signals in patients.
Molloy J; Markus HS
Stroke; 1996 Sep; 27(9):1548-52. PubMed ID: 8784128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of velocity on the appearance of embolic signals studied in transcranial Doppler models.
Droste DW; Markus HS; Nassiri D; Brown MM
Stroke; 1994 May; 25(5):986-91. PubMed ID: 7909392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Importance of time-window overlap in the detection and analysis of embolic signals.
Markus H
Stroke; 1995 Nov; 26(11):2044-7. PubMed ID: 7482647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Online automated detection of cerebral embolic signals from a variety of embolic sources.
Cullinane M; Kaposzta Z; Reihill S; Markus HS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Oct; 28(10):1271-7. PubMed ID: 12467853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiation between emboli and artefacts using dual-gated transcranial Doppler ultrasound.
Smith JL; Evans DH; Fan L; Bell PR; Naylor AR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1996; 22(8):1031-6. PubMed ID: 9004426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a decibel threshold in detecting Doppler embolic signals.
Markus HS; Molloy J
Stroke; 1997 Apr; 28(4):692-5. PubMed ID: 9099180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intercenter agreement in reading Doppler embolic signals. A multicenter international study.
Markus HS; Ackerstaff R; Babikian V; Bladin C; Droste D; Grosset D; Levi C; Russell D; Siebler M; Tegeler C
Stroke; 1997 Jul; 28(7):1307-10. PubMed ID: 9227673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Online automated detection of cerebral embolic signals using a wavelet-based system.
Marvasti S; Gillies D; Marvasti F; Markus HS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 May; 30(5):647-53. PubMed ID: 15183231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can transcranial Doppler discriminate between solid and gaseous microemboli? Assessment of a dual-frequency transducer system.
Markus HS; Punter M
Stroke; 2005 Aug; 36(8):1731-4. PubMed ID: 16020767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic embolus detection by a neural network.
Kemény V; Droste DW; Hermes S; Nabavi DG; Schulte-Altedorneburg G; Siebler M; Ringelstein EB
Stroke; 1999 Apr; 30(4):807-10. PubMed ID: 10187883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Circulating cerebral microembolisms. Detection with transcranial Doppler ultrasound].
Thiel A; Kaps M
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1996 Apr; 31(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 8672613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of asymptomatic cerebral embolic signals with Doppler ultrasound.
Markus HS; Droste DW; Brown MM
Lancet; 1994 Apr; 343(8904):1011-2. PubMed ID: 7909051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of four methods for distinguishing Doppler signals from gaseous and particulate emboli.
Smith JL; Evans DH; Bell PR; Naylor AR
Stroke; 1998 Jun; 29(6):1133-8. PubMed ID: 9626284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intracranial microembolic signals in 500 patients with potential cardiac or carotid embolic source and in normal controls.
Georgiadis D; Lindner A; Manz M; Sonntag M; Zunker P; Zerkowski HR; Borggrefe M
Stroke; 1997 Jun; 28(6):1203-7. PubMed ID: 9183352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of clinical environment on embolus detection: a comparison of automated and manual detection of Doppler embolic signals.
Chung EM; Fan L; Naylor AR; Evans DH
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2007; 23(2-3):169-74. PubMed ID: 17124399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
