88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10436751)
1. [Morphological parameters of breast cancers detected by mammography with and without organized screening; a comparative study].
Liszka G; Petrányi A; Udvarhelyi N; Demeter J; Bodó M; Besznyák I; Ladányi A; Vargha P; Döbróssy L
Orv Hetil; 1999 Jul; 140(27):1533-6. PubMed ID: 10436751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The state of the organised mammography screening in Hungary in 2006].
Kovács A; Döbrossy L; Budai A; Boncz I; Cornides A
Orv Hetil; 2007 May; 148(19):879-85. PubMed ID: 17478403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early breast cancer deaths in women aged 40-74 years diagnosed during the first 5 years of organised mammography service screening in north Sweden.
Bordás P; Jonsson H; Nyström L; Cajander S; Lenner P
Breast; 2004 Aug; 13(4):276-83. PubMed ID: 15325661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The attendance of the first screening round (2002-2003) of the Hungarian organized breast cancer screening program and its effect on the number of diagnostic and screening mammography].
Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Döbrossy L; Péntek Z; Kovács A; Csaba D; Budai A; Ember I
Orv Hetil; 2005 Sep; 146(38):1963-70. PubMed ID: 16238249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screen-detected breast cancer compared to symptomatic presentation: an analysis of surgical treatment and end-points of effective mammographic screening.
Spillane AJ; Kennedy CW; Gillett DJ; Carmalt HL; Janu NC; Rickard MT; Donnellan MJ
ANZ J Surg; 2001 Jul; 71(7):398-402. PubMed ID: 11450913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer].
Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results.
Thurfjell E
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1995; 395():1-22. PubMed ID: 7839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast cancer screening with mammography: a population-based, randomized trial with mammography as the only screening mode.
Andersson I; Andrén L; Hildell J; Linell F; Ljungqvist U; Pettersson H
Radiology; 1979 Aug; 132(2):273-6. PubMed ID: 461778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Attendance in the second phase (2004-2005) of the Hungarian organized breast cancer screening program].
Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Döbrossy L; Péntek Z; Kovács A; Budai A; Kövi R; Ember I
Orv Hetil; 2008 Aug; 149(32):1491-8. PubMed ID: 18672438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Mammographic screening in the county of Copenhagen. Clinical consequences of the first three screening rounds].
Tange UB; Hirsch FR; Jensen MB; Olsen AH; Blichert-Toft M; Rank FE; Vejborg IM; Mouridsen H; Lynge E
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Feb; 164(8):1036-40. PubMed ID: 11894704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Axillary node dissection in patients with breast cancer diagnosed through the Ontario Breast Screening Program: a need for minimally invasive techniques.
Singhal H; O'Malley FP; Tweedie E; Stitt L; Tonkin KS
Can J Surg; 1997 Oct; 40(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 9336528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The clinical and pathological differences in prevalent round screen-detected and symptomatic invasive breast cancer.
Sweeney KJ; Kell MR; Aziz NA; Prunty N; Holloway P; Kennedy M; Flanagan F; Kerin MJ
Ir Med J; 2007 Sep; 100(8):550-2. PubMed ID: 17955686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of clinical-pathological characteristics between symptomatic and interval breast cancer.
Meshkat B; Prichard RS; Al-Hilli Z; Bass GA; Quinn C; O'Doherty A; Rothwell J; Geraghty J; Evoy D; McDermott EW
Breast; 2015 Jun; 24(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 25771080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The organisation and results of first screening round of the Hungarian nationwide organised breast cancer screening programme.
Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Döbrossy L; Péntek Z; Budai A; Kovács A; Dózsa C; Ember I
Ann Oncol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):795-9. PubMed ID: 17259642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
