157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10437634)
1. The NoGo-anteriorization as a neurophysiological standard-index for cognitive response control.
Fallgatter AJ; Strik WK
Int J Psychophysiol; 1999 Jun; 32(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10437634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation.
Strik WK; Fallgatter AJ; Brandeis D; Pascual-Marqui RD
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Jul; 108(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 9714383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A robust assessment of the NoGo-anteriorisation of P300 microstates in a cued Continuous Performance Test.
Fallgatter AJ; Brandeis D; Strik WK
Brain Topogr; 1997; 9(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 9217988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased NoGo-anteriorisation in first-episode schizophrenia patients during Continuous Performance Test.
Kleinlogel H; Strik W; Begré S
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2683-91. PubMed ID: 17910935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stability of late event-related potentials: topographical descriptors of motor control compared with the P300 amplitude.
Fallgatter AJ; Esienack SS; Neuhauser B; Aranda D; Scheuerpflug P; Herrmann MJ
Brain Topogr; 2000; 12(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 10912733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrophysiological correlates of behavioral response inhibition in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Kim MS; Kim YY; Yoo SY; Kwon JS
Depress Anxiety; 2007; 24(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 16933318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduced response-inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder measured with topographic evoked potential mapping.
Herrmann MJ; Jacob C; Unterecker S; Fallgatter AJ
Psychiatry Res; 2003 Oct; 120(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 14561438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The NoGo P300 'anteriorization' effect and response inhibition.
Salisbury DF; Griggs CB; Shenton ME; McCarley RW
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1550-8. PubMed ID: 15203056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age-related changes in the brain electrical correlates of response control.
Fallgatter AJ; Mueller TJ; Strik WK
Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 May; 110(5):833-8. PubMed ID: 10400196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The P3 in 'ecstasy' polydrug users during response inhibition and execution.
Gamma A; Brandeis D; Brandeis R; Vollenweider FX
J Psychopharmacol; 2005 Sep; 19(5):504-12. PubMed ID: 16166188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduced P300 responses in criminal psychopaths during a visual oddball task.
Kiehl KA; Hare RD; Liddle PF; McDonald JJ
Biol Psychiatry; 1999 Jun; 45(11):1498-507. PubMed ID: 10356633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intelligence moderates impulsivity and attention in ADHD children: an ERP study using a go/nogo paradigm.
Buchmann J; Gierow W; Reis O; Haessler F
World J Biol Psychiatry; 2011 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():35-9. PubMed ID: 21905993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term reliability of electrophysiologic response control parameters.
Fallgatter AJ; Aranda DR; Bartsch AJ; Herrmann MJ
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 11896354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition.
Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 119(3):704-714. PubMed ID: 18164657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Test-retest reliability of electrophysiological parameters related to cognitive motor control.
Fallgatter AJ; Bartsch AJ; Strik WK; Mueller TJ; Eisenack SS; Neuhauser B; Aranda D; Herrmann MJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Jan; 112(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 11137678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrophysiological underpinnings of response variability in the Go/NoGo task.
Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():159-167. PubMed ID: 30266622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: a failure to replicate Simson et al.
Smith JL; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 23669175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
