BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10437682)

  • 1. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in laboratory animals.
    Khvoles R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Audiology; 1999; 38(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 10437682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions can be recorded in the rat.
    Khvoles R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Hear Res; 1996 Aug; 97(1-2):120-6. PubMed ID: 8844192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Yates GK; Withnell RH
    Hear Res; 1999 Oct; 136(1-2):49-64. PubMed ID: 10511624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in the neonatal rat.
    Khvoles R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Audiol Neurootol; 1998; 3(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 9502540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term stability between click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs: A comparison.
    Hoshino M; Ueda H; Nakata S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 10450050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustically and electrically evoked contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs.
    Popelár J; Valvoda J; Syka J
    Hear Res; 1999 Sep; 135(1-2):61-70. PubMed ID: 10491955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of the crossed acoustic reflex on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in awake rabbits.
    Whitehead ML; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 1991 Jan; 51(1):55-72. PubMed ID: 2013546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Otoacoustic emissions measured with a physically open recording system.
    Withnell RH; Kirk DL; Yates GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):350-5. PubMed ID: 9670528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences from patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Hine JE; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):122-33. PubMed ID: 15855037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Bergman BM; Beauchaine KL; Kaminski JR; Peters J; Schulte L; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2639-48. PubMed ID: 8270740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions to pediatric populations.
    Norton SJ
    Ear Hear; 1993 Feb; 14(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 8383069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures.
    Talmadge CL; Tubis A; Long GR; Piskorski P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Sep; 104(3 Pt 1):1517-43. PubMed ID: 9745736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Swept-tone transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Bennett CL; Özdamar Ö
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1833-44. PubMed ID: 20968356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using the short-time correlation coefficient to compare transient- and derived, noise-evoked otoacoustic emission temporal waveforms.
    Harte JM; Elliott SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):2989-98. PubMed ID: 15957769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sources and mechanisms of DPOAE generation: implications for the prediction of auditory sensitivity.
    Shaffer LA; Withnell RH; Dhar S; Lilly DJ; Goodman SS; Harmon KM
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):367-79. PubMed ID: 14534408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.
    Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Folsom RC; Sininger Y; Cone-Wesson B; Vohr BR; Mascher K; Fletcher K
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):508-28. PubMed ID: 11059707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.