113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10437682)
21. Transiently evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Comparison of results from normally hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.
Probst R; Harris FP
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1993 Aug; 119(8):858-60. PubMed ID: 8343248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions following changes in external auditory canal acoustic impedance.
Stephen RO; Badham NJ
Audiology; 1996; 35(4):180-93. PubMed ID: 8879446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects.
Hood LJ; Berlin CI; Hurley A; Cecola RP; Bell B
Hear Res; 1996 Nov; 101(1-2):113-8. PubMed ID: 8951438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Tognola G; Grandori F; Ravazzani P
Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 106(1-2):112-22. PubMed ID: 9112111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions declines with age: a comparison of findings in CBA mice with human listeners.
Jacobson M; Kim S; Romney J; Zhu X; Frisina RD
Laryngoscope; 2003 Oct; 113(10):1707-13. PubMed ID: 14520094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of high-dose cisplatin on auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in laboratory animals.
Sockalingam R; Freeman S; Cherny TL; Sohmer H
Am J Otol; 2000 Jul; 21(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 10912698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of transient evoked otoacoustic emission thresholds recorded conventionally and using maximum length sequences.
Hine JE; Ho CT; Slaven A; Thornton AR
Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 156(1-2):104-14. PubMed ID: 11377886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold.
Pienkowski M; Kunov H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1496-502. PubMed ID: 11325121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Multi-variant analysis of otoacoustic emissions and estimation of hearing thresholds: transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Vinck BM; Van Cauwenberge PB; Corthals P; De Vel E
Audiology; 1998; 37(6):315-34. PubMed ID: 9888189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sensitivity of transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions to the direct effects of noise on the human cochlea.
Vinck BM; Van Cauwenberge PB; Leroy L; Corthals P
Audiology; 1999; 38(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 10052835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of temperature on the transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in rats.
Khvoles R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
Audiol Neurootol; 1998; 3(6):349-60. PubMed ID: 9732129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Objective audiometry with DPOAEs : New findings for generation mechanisms and clinical applications.
Zelle D; Dalhoff E; Gummer AW
HNO; 2017 Aug; 65(Suppl 2):122-129. PubMed ID: 28470484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of continuous versus interrupted noise exposures on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs.
Chang KW; Norton SJ
Hear Res; 1996 Jul; 96(1-2):1-12. PubMed ID: 8817301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reporting click-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emission results with respect to the pure-tone audiogram.
Harris FP; Probst R
Ear Hear; 1991 Dec; 12(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 1797607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Are normal hearing thresholds a sufficient condition for click-evoked otoacoustic emissions?
Kapadia S; Lutman ME
J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3566-7. PubMed ID: 9547113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.
Shera CA; Guinan JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Feb; 105(2 Pt 1):782-98. PubMed ID: 9972564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Measures of auditory brain-stem responses, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, hair cell loss, and forward masked tuning curves in the waltzing guinea pig.
Canlon B; Marklund K; Borg E
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3232-43. PubMed ID: 8300958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Time-frequency analysis of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions via smoothed pseudo Wigner distribution.
Cheng J
Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 7660060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorder using maximum length sequences as a function of stimulus rate and level.
Hine JE; Thornton AR
Ear Hear; 1997 Apr; 18(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 9099561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of contralateral acoustical stimulation on three measures of cochlear function in the guinea pig.
Popelár J; Erre JP; Syka J; Aran JM
Hear Res; 2001 Feb; 152(1-2):128-38. PubMed ID: 11223287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
