These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10437693)
1. Bilateral breast carcinomas: do they have similar mammographic features? Hall NJ; Evans AJ; Kollias J; Denley H; Pinder SE; Ellis IO; Blamey RW; Wilson AR Clin Radiol; 1999 Jul; 54(7):434-7. PubMed ID: 10437693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic appearance of cancer in the opposite breast: comparison with the first cancer. Roubidoux MA; Lai NE; Paramagul C; Joynt LK; Helvie MA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 8571898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bilateral breast carcinoma: mammographic and histologic correlation. Murphy TJ; Conant EF; Hanau CA; Ehrlich SM; Feig SA Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):617-21. PubMed ID: 7753983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography. Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Lai NE; Paramagul C Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 7617856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer. Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic findings after breast augmentation with autologous fat injection. Carvajal J; Patiño JH Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 19083521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammographic and clinicopathological features of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. Matsuda M; Yoshimoto M; Iwase T; Takahashi K; Kasumi F; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G Breast Cancer; 2000 Jan; 7(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11029773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with ipsilateral breast carcinoma: the role of mammography. Muttarak M; Pojchamarnwiputh S; Padungchaichote W; Chaiwun B Singapore Med J; 2002 May; 43(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 12188073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Limitations of mammography in the identification of noninfiltrating carcinoma of the breast. Sener SF; Candela FC; Paige ML; Bernstein JR; Winchester DP Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 2840746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationships between age, mammographic features and pathological tumour characteristics in non-palpable breast cancer. Ferranti C; Coopmans de Yoldi G; Biganzoli E; Bergonzi S; Mariani L; Scaperrotta G; Marchesini M Br J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 73(871):698-705. PubMed ID: 11089459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer. Boyd NF; Jensen HM; Cooke G; Han HL J Natl Cancer Inst; 1992 Aug; 84(15):1170-9. PubMed ID: 1635085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: mammographic appearance with pathologic correlation. Patterson SK; Tworek JA; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Oberman HA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):709-12. PubMed ID: 9275883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, clinical and pathologic findings. Günhan-Bilgen I; Oktay A Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jan; 61(1):158-62. PubMed ID: 16987629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of mammographic interval on stage and survival after the diagnosis of contralateral breast cancer. Kaas R; Hart AA; Besnard AP; Peterse JL; Rutgers EJ Br J Surg; 2001 Jan; 88(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 11136324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]