These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10438203)
61. The industry perspective on the inclusion of women in clinical trials. Bush JK Acad Med; 1994 Sep; 69(9):708-15. PubMed ID: 8074760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Surrogate decision making for severely cognitively impaired research subjects: the continuing debate. DeRenzo E Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(4):539-48. PubMed ID: 7858753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Why should we include women and minorities in randomized controlled trials? Weijer C; Crouch RA J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 10633280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. The role of the NIH's Office of Research on Women's Health. Pinn VW Acad Med; 1994 Sep; 69(9):698-702. PubMed ID: 8074758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Women's health initiative leads way as research begins to fill gender gaps. Cotton P JAMA; 1992 Jan 22-29; 267(4):469-70, 473. PubMed ID: 1729560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Placebo orthodoxy in clinical research. II: Ethical, legal, and regulatory myths. Freedman B; Glass KC; Weijer C J Law Med Ethics; 1996; 24(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 9069852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects. Owens JF Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Women in clinical trials: an FDA perspective. Sherman LA; Temple R; Merkatz RB Science; 1995 Aug; 269(5225):793-5. PubMed ID: 7638593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Women in clinical trials: are sponsors liable for fetal injury? Sandomire H J Law Med Ethics; 1993; 21(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 8130832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Balancing moral principles in federal regulations on human research. Ackerman TF IRB; 1992; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. SSPR Mini-Symposium: Methodologic Controversies in Clinical Research: Consent for experimentation involving neonates. Silverman WA Am J Med Sci; 1988 Nov; 296(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 3057915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. The new NIH and FDA medical research policies: targeting gender, promoting justice. Baird KL J Health Polit Policy Law; 1999 Jun; 24(3):531-65. PubMed ID: 10386326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Sex & gender: the politics, policy, and practice of medical research. Keitt SK Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2003; 3(2):253-78. PubMed ID: 14577143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy. Cahill H Nurs Ethics; 1999 Nov; 6(6):494-505. PubMed ID: 10696195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Informed consent and abortion. Kapp MB Wis L Rev; 1993; 1993(2):619-23. PubMed ID: 11659680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. The standard of disclosure in human subject experimentation. Morin K J Leg Med; 1998 Jun; 19(2):157-221. PubMed ID: 9658739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Ethics, empathy, and gender in health care. Nadelson CC Am J Psychiatry; 1993 Sep; 150(9):1309-14. PubMed ID: 8352341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. True protection for persons with severe mental disabilities, such as schizophrenia, involved as subjects in research? A look and consideration of the "Protection of Human Subjects. Ryan AJ J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(2):349-76. PubMed ID: 11657417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]