These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 104389)
1. Risk benefit in mass screening programs for breast cancer. Miller AB Semin Oncol; 1978 Dec; 5(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 104389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for breast cancer in India--is it an appropriate strategy? Moss S J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1270-1. PubMed ID: 18780862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk- and cost-benefit analyses of breast screening programs derived from absorbed dose measurements in The Netherlands. Zuur C; Broerse JJ Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):211-22. PubMed ID: 3928229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The costs and benefits of breast cancer screening. Miller AB Am J Prev Med; 1993; 9(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 8347369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography screening for breast cancer. Med Lett Drugs Ther; 1980 Jun; 22(13):53-4. PubMed ID: 7382906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Early detection of breast cancer: results of a screening programme. Beahrs OH Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1980 Jan; 62(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 7362187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer screening--right or wrong? Chamberlain J Trans Med Soc Lond; 1990-1991; 107():53-7. PubMed ID: 2152425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Population screening for breast cancer by mammography in The Netherlands. Expectations, early results, negative effects and conditions for large-scale screening. Hendriks JH; Verbeek AL Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):186-91. PubMed ID: 3896616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mammography screening: presentation of scientific evidence as a basis for communication with women]. Mühlhauser I; Höldke B Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Oct; 94(9):721-31. PubMed ID: 11127779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimated benefits and risks of screening for breast cancer. Howe GR; Sherman GJ; Semenciw RM; Miller AB Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Feb; 124(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 7011526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Critical notes on the risk/benefit/cost discussion in mammography from the clinical point of view]. Frischbier HJ; Würthner K Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1977; 18():95-100. PubMed ID: 414383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiogenic breast cancer effects of mammographic screening. Gohagan JK; Darby WP; Spitznagel EL; Monsees BS; Tome AE J Natl Cancer Inst; 1986 Jul; 77(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 3459927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer screening for women 40 to 49 years of age: what is a clinician to do? Gemignani ML Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):548-9. PubMed ID: 17766597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychological distress associated with organized breast cancer screening. Steggles S; Lightfoot N; Sellick SM Cancer Prev Control; 1998 Oct; 2(5):213-20. PubMed ID: 10093635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening and prevention of breast cancer in primary care. Tice JA; Kerlikowske K Prim Care; 2009 Sep; 36(3):533-58. PubMed ID: 19616154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The National Study of Breast Cancer Screening Protocol for a Canadian Randomized Controlled trial of screening for breast cancer in women. Miller AB; Howe GR; Wall C Clin Invest Med; 1981; 4(3-4):227-58. PubMed ID: 6802546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening for breast cancer and cost-effectiveness of thermal diagnostic techniques. Berger GS; Keith LG Prog Clin Biol Res; 1982; 107():839-49. PubMed ID: 6820147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. False-positive results in breast cancer screening. Evans MF Can Fam Physician; 1999 Jan; 45():73-4. PubMed ID: 10889859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of radiation risk from screening mammography. Feig SA Cancer; 1996 Mar; 77(5):818-22. PubMed ID: 8608469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]