147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10439504)
1. An analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference.
Burns DJ; Gold DE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jul; 25(4):978-85. PubMed ID: 10439504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rate of forgetting in amnesia: II. Recall and recognition of word lists at different levels of organization.
Isaac CL; Mayes AR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jul; 25(4):963-77. PubMed ID: 10439503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using cumulative-recall curves to assess the extent of relational and item-specific processing.
Burns DJ; Hebert T
Memory; 2005 Feb; 13(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15847230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: evidence from multiple recall tests.
Mulligan NW
Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 10946537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cued recall hypermnesia is not an artifact of response bias.
Otani H; Whiteman HL
Am J Psychol; 1994; 107(3):401-21. PubMed ID: 7977903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Win some, lose some: hypermnesia for actions reflects increased item-specific processing.
Olofsson U
Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 9421565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Generation and hypermnesia.
Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):436-50. PubMed ID: 11294442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.
Burns DJ; Jenkins CL; Dean EE
Mem Cognit; 2007 Oct; 35(7):1630-40. PubMed ID: 18062541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gains and losses in action memory.
Engelkamp J; Seiler KH
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jul; 56(5):829-48. PubMed ID: 12850992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic changes in hypermnesia across early and late tests: a relational/item-specific account.
McDaniel MA; Moore BA; Whiteman HL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Jan; 24(1):173-85. PubMed ID: 9438958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: perceptual interference and multiple recall tests.
Mulligan NW
Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 12120803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rate of forgetting in amnesia: I. Recall and recognition of prose.
Isaac CL; Mayes AR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jul; 25(4):942-62. PubMed ID: 10439502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing can facilitate forgetting of tested items.
Wakebe T; Watamura E; Sato T
J Gen Psychol; 2021; 148(4):383-397. PubMed ID: 32270749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Heightened susceptibility to interference in an animal model of amnesia: impairment in encoding, storage, retrieval--or all three?
Bartko SJ; Cowell RA; Winters BD; Bussey TJ; Saksida LM
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):2987-97. PubMed ID: 20561536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hypermnesia and the Role of Delay between Study and Test.
Wallner LA; Bäuml KT
Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):878-894. PubMed ID: 29696580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The similar effects of verbal and non-verbal intervening tasks on word recall in an elderly population.
Williams BR; Sullivan SK; Morra LF; Williams JR; Donovick PJ
Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(3):505-13. PubMed ID: 24641093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total retrieval time and hypermnesia: investigating the benefits of multiple recall tests.
Mulligan NW
Psychol Res; 2005 Mar; 69(4):272-84. PubMed ID: 15168120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Remembering the forgotten? Reminiscence, hypermnesia and memory for order.
Kelley MR; Nairne JS
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 May; 56(4):577-99. PubMed ID: 12745831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The category access measure of relational processing.
Burns DJ; Brown CA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jul; 26(4):1057-62. PubMed ID: 10946378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
