115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10439809)
1. The standard of care in cytopathology.
Gatter K
Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Aug; 112(2):273-4. PubMed ID: 10439809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Pap smear liability crisis.
McCoy DR; Sidoti MS
Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Aug; 112(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 10439810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Pap smear, automated rescreening, and negligent nondisclosure.
Godfrey SE
Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jan; 111(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 9894449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pap smear liability: do computer-assisted rescreening devices affect the standard of care?
Bierig JR; Weber SA
CAP Today; 1997 Apr; 11(4):32-4. PubMed ID: 10174223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A smear on audit. Implications of the Leicester cervical smear audit.
Symonds P; Naftalin N; Shaw P
BJOG; 2003 Jul; 110(7):646-8. PubMed ID: 12842054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. False-negative cervical smears: medico-legal fallacies and suggested remedies.
Slater DN
Cytopathology; 1998 Jun; 9(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 9638375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear.
Sirota RL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Dec; 121(12):1237-8. PubMed ID: 9431309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Are Current Tort Liability Doctrines Adequate for Addressing Injury Caused by AI?
Sullivan HR; Schweikart SJ
AMA J Ethics; 2019 Feb; 21(2):E160-166. PubMed ID: 30794126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing the error rate in Papanicolaou smears. One laboratory's experience with the PAPNET system.
Koss LG
Physician Assist; 1994 Dec; 18(12):48-52. PubMed ID: 10139375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated cytologic screening devices and malpractice liability.
Skoumal SM; Cohen MB
Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Aug; 17(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 9258613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. HPV: from the cervical smear to the research bench to the court room.
Atkins K
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2003; 17(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 14692078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three women win in cancer screening case.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1999 Feb; 318(7182):484. PubMed ID: 10094532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Statement on technical devices for innovation in cervical cytology screening.
Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Oct; 106(4):441. PubMed ID: 8853029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated screening for cervical cancer: diagnostic decision procedures.
Bartels PH; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 9022719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A decade has passed...the Pap smear and cervical cancer.
Linder J
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 9353086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative smears].
Vassilakos P; de Marval F; Muñoz M
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1998 Jan; 118(1):97. PubMed ID: 9580199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Too early to solve Pap device puzzle.
Check W
CAP Today; 1997 Jun; 11(6):1, 44-6, 48-9 passim. PubMed ID: 10174227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Tennessee court finds liability without negligence.
Bierig J
CAP Today; 2000 Jan; 14(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 10788293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-assisted detection in clinical practice: medical legal considerations.
Brenner RJ
Semin Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 42(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 17919530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
