131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10439810)
1. The Pap smear liability crisis.
McCoy DR; Sidoti MS
Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Aug; 112(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 10439810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Pap smear, automated rescreening, and negligent nondisclosure.
Godfrey SE
Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jan; 111(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 9894449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The standard of care in cytopathology.
Gatter K
Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Aug; 112(2):273-4. PubMed ID: 10439809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A smear on audit. Implications of the Leicester cervical smear audit.
Symonds P; Naftalin N; Shaw P
BJOG; 2003 Jul; 110(7):646-8. PubMed ID: 12842054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A decade has passed...the Pap smear and cervical cancer.
Linder J
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 9353086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pap smear liability: do computer-assisted rescreening devices affect the standard of care?
Bierig JR; Weber SA
CAP Today; 1997 Apr; 11(4):32-4. PubMed ID: 10174223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pap smears: physicians must disclose risk of refusal.
Annas GJ
Nurs Law Ethics; 1981 Jan; 2(1):3. PubMed ID: 12085919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Papanicolaou smear: can we make a good test better? Technical and interpretive challenges for the practitioner.
Eltabbakh GH; Eltabbakh GD
J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 1999 May; 8(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 10839701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. HPV: from the cervical smear to the research bench to the court room.
Atkins K
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2003; 17(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 14692078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear.
Sirota RL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Dec; 121(12):1237-8. PubMed ID: 9431309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated Papanicolaou smear analysis as a screening tool for female lower genital tract malignancies.
Ku NN
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 11(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 10047962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural network processing can provide means to catch errors that slip through human screening of pap smears.
Boon ME; Kok LP
Diagn Cytopathol; 1993 Aug; 9(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 8261846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. False-negative cervical smears: medico-legal fallacies and suggested remedies.
Slater DN
Cytopathology; 1998 Jun; 9(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 9638375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pap smear refined.
Oncology (Williston Park); 1997 Aug; 11(8):1125. PubMed ID: 9268975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Classification of cervical cancer cells using FTIR data.
Njoroge E; Alty SR; Gani MR; Alkatib M
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():5338-41. PubMed ID: 17945893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated cytologic screening devices and malpractice liability.
Skoumal SM; Cohen MB
Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Aug; 17(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 9258613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Gynaecological cytopathology and the search for perfection: civil liability and regulatory ramifications.
Freckelton I
J Law Med; 2003 Nov; 11(2):185-200. PubMed ID: 14655583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reducing the error rate in Papanicolaou smears. One laboratory's experience with the PAPNET system.
Koss LG
Physician Assist; 1994 Dec; 18(12):48-52. PubMed ID: 10139375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Should we abandon pap smear testing?
DeMay RM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Nov; 114 Suppl():S48-51. PubMed ID: 11996169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
