185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10440635)
1. Root coverage employing an envelope technique or guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable membrane.
Müller HP; Stahl M; Eger T
J Periodontol; 1999 Jul; 70(7):743-51. PubMed ID: 10440635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Failure of root coverage of shallow gingival recessions employing GTR and a bioresorbable membrane.
Müller HP; Stahl M; Eger T
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Apr; 21(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 11829391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession.
Amarante ES; Leknes KN; Skavland J; Lie T
J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):989-98. PubMed ID: 10914803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects.
Zucchelli G; Clauser C; De Sanctis M; Calandriello M
J Periodontol; 1998 Feb; 69(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 9526912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gingival dimensions after root coverage with free connective tissue grafts.
Müller HP; Eger T; Schorb A
J Clin Periodontol; 1998 May; 25(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 9650881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gingival recession treatment: guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane versus connective tissue graft.
Tatakis DN; Trombelli L
J Periodontol; 2000 Feb; 71(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 10711621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recession.
Borghetti A; Glise JM; Monnet-Corti V; Dejou J
J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10102549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Aroca S; Molnár B; Windisch P; Gera I; Salvi GE; Nikolidakis D; Sculean A
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Jul; 40(7):713-20. PubMed ID: 23627374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects.
Trombelli L; Scabbia A; Tatakis DN; Calura G
J Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1271-7. PubMed ID: 9848537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative clinical study of guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable bilayer collagen membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Romagna-Genon C
J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1258-64. PubMed ID: 11577960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of 2 root coverage techniques: guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable matrix style membrane versus a connective tissue graft combined with a coronally positioned pedicle graft without vertical incisions. results of a series of consecutive cases.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 1998 Dec; 69(12):1426-34. PubMed ID: 9926774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions.
Rebele SF; Zuhr O; Schneider D; Jung RE; Hürzeler MB
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):593-603. PubMed ID: 24708338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions.
Cordioli G; Mortarino C; Chierico A; Grusovin MG; Majzoub Z
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1470-6. PubMed ID: 11759857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of gingival recession with titanium reinforced barrier membranes versus connective tissue grafts.
Jepsen K; Heinz B; Halben JH; Jepsen S
J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):383-91. PubMed ID: 9579626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment outcomes of ligature-induced recession in the dog model using guided tissue regeneration or coronally positioned flap procedures.
Papageorgiou A; Vouros I; Konstantinidis A
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2009 Apr; 11(2):177-87. PubMed ID: 19431957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Guided tissue regeneration using a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human buccal recession. A re-entry study.
Waterman CA
J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):982-9. PubMed ID: 9358365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of gingival recessions by guided tissue regeneration and coronally advanced flap.
Banihashemrad A; Aghassizadeh E; Radvar M
N Y State Dent J; 2009 Jan; 75(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 19280831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of resorbable membrane in treatment of human gingival isolated buccal recession.
Narang S; Gupta R
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 22484865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession.
Wang HL; Bunyaratavej P; Labadie M; Shyr Y; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
