These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10440691)

  • 1. The cost-effectiveness of nationwide breast carcinoma screening in Finland, 1987-1992.
    Leivo T; Sintonen H; Tuominen R; Hakama M; Pukkala E; Heinonen OP
    Cancer; 1999 Aug; 86(4):638-46. PubMed ID: 10440691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in women on dialysis.
    Wong G; Howard K; Chapman JR; Craig JC
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Nov; 52(5):916-29. PubMed ID: 18789566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Health economics analysis of breast cancer screening].
    Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Gulácsi L; Pál M; Dózsa C
    Magy Onkol; 2003; 47(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 12975661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incremental cost-effectiveness of double-reading mammograms.
    Leivo T; Salminen T; Sintonen H; Tuominen R; Auerma K; Partanen K; Saari U; Hakama M; Heinonen OP
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1999 Apr; 54(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 10445425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.
    Stout NK; Rosenberg MA; Trentham-Dietz A; Smith MA; Robinson SM; Fryback DG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jun; 98(11):774-82. PubMed ID: 16757702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The National Cancer Screening Program for breast cancer in the Republic of Korea: is it cost-effective?
    Kang MH; Park EC; Choi KS; Suh M; Jun JK; Cho E
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(3):2059-65. PubMed ID: 23679319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
    Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer screening by mammography in Norway. Is it cost-effective?
    Norum J
    Ann Oncol; 1999 Feb; 10(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 10093689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality-controlled mammography screening program from the Swiss statutory health-care perspective: quantitative assessment of the most influential factors.
    Neeser K; Szucs T; Bulliard JL; Bachmann G; Schramm W
    Value Health; 2007; 10(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 17261115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cost-benefit analysis of a mammography screening program extended to all the national territory].
    Vanara F; Zappa M; Rosselli del Turco M; Segnan N; Paci E; Ponti A
    Epidemiol Prev; 1997; 21(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 9378179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cost-effectiveness of mammography screening: evidence from a microsimulation model for New Zealand.
    Szeto KL; Devlin NJ
    Health Policy; 1996 Nov; 38(2):101-15. PubMed ID: 10160378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefits and costs of screening and treatment for early breast cancer. Development of a basic benefit package.
    Kattlove H; Liberati A; Keeler E; Brook RH
    JAMA; 1995 Jan; 273(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 7799495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Costs of breast cancer and the cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening.
    Elixhauser A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(4):604-15. PubMed ID: 1778705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
    JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of extending screening mammography guidelines to include women 40 to 49 years of age.
    Salzmann P; Kerlikowske K; Phillips K
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Dec; 127(11):955-65. PubMed ID: 9412300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammography screening in Norway: results from the first screening round in four counties and cost-effectiveness of a modeled nationwide screening.
    Wang H; Kåresen R; Hervik A; Thoresen SO
    Cancer Causes Control; 2001 Jan; 12(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 11227924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
    Hristova L; Hakama M
    Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of the Norwegian breast cancer screening program.
    van Luijt PA; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    Int J Cancer; 2017 Feb; 140(4):833-840. PubMed ID: 27861849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Organized versus Opportunistic Screening for Breast Cancer in Austria.
    Schiller-Fruehwirth I; Jahn B; Einzinger P; Zauner G; Urach C; Siebert U
    Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1048-1057. PubMed ID: 28964436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening in Norway].
    Kåresen R; Bø JK; Haustveit S; Hervik A; Thoresen SO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Oct; 119(24):3553-9. PubMed ID: 10563171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.